On May 3, 2017

Wind energy: Bad for you, bad for the environment

By Annette Smith

Prospective neighbors of wind turbines heard all the promises: “Quiet as a library.” “Like a baby’s breath.” “The same decibel level as a refrigerator.” The more brazen wind developers claimed, “You will not hear them.”

Then the 450-foot wind towers with their bus-size nacelles and three-bladed fans were built. Sixteen in Sheffield, four on Georgia Mountain, 21 in Lowell. And neighbors learned the truth. Yes, you can hear them. They sound like “a jet plane that never lands,” or “sneakers in a drier,” or there is a “thump thump thump” or a “whoosh whoosh whoosh” as the blade passes the tower, causing something called amplitude modulation.

“If the noise was the same all the time, maybe we could get used to it,” some exasperated neighbors have said.

Wind turbine neighbors talk about feeling a deep rhythmic rumble inside their homes. “We feel the vibrations over the TV set,” they said. That is the low frequency noise.

Some farmers living five miles from the Lowell wind turbines talk about the side of the barn vibrating. The Nelsons, who had no choice but to sell their jewel of a farm in Lowell to Green Mountain Power due to their deteriorating health and quality of life, saw the windows in their house vibrate, and the vibrations were visible in a bowl of water on the kitchen counter.

Some neighbors experience the barometric pressure waves that hit their homes, turning the house into a drum, producing inaudible infrasound inside the home at higher levels than outside. “Imagine you are sitting at your kitchen table and are seasick, except you are not on a boat and nowhere near water,” said one former neighbor whose family became so sick after living 3,500 feet from the wind turbines that they abandoned their home of 17 years.

Infrasound cannot be heard, but it has been scientifically proven by recent studies to be a component of the acoustical profile of wind turbines. The vortexing pressure waves do not dissipate and can go out for miles.

The unique noise produced by wind turbines does not create a problem for the wind industry, though. “There are no problems,” is their attitude. “It’s all in their heads,” they state. “The ‘nocebo effect’ is at work,” they claim, alleging that people’s beliefs are making them sick. They heap ridicule on neighbors who are victimized once by the wind turbines themselves, a second time by the industry which refuses to accept responsibility, and a third time by regulators who have turned a deaf ear to the hundreds of complaints filed by Vermonters since mountaintop wind turbines began operating.

A unanimous vote by the Vermont House last year affirmed that there is a problem. The Legislature directed the Vermont Public Service Board to right the wrong that has occurred.

The PSB has issued a rule that sets a nighttime level of 35 dBA (audible decibels). This has resulted in a shrill response from wind proponents who absurdly claim that this standard, which is the nighttime noise standard for wind turbines in Germany, would outlaw bird songs.

Nighttime background noise levels in the areas where wind turbines have been constructed are about 20 dBA. Ten dBA above background is well known to result in complaints. It is the noise standard that has been used in Massachusetts for decades. By that measure, the correct standard for wind turbines in the very quiet areas where wind turbines are being built would be 30 dBA — lower than the PSB is proposing.

The best solution for protecting people from infrasound is distance. The PSB rule has a 10 times total height setback, or 5,000 feet for 500-foot tall wind turbines, the same as places in Germany. It may not be far enough, but it is a step in the right direction.

The wind developers have made big promises. Now they have promises to keep — so their neighbors don’t have miles to go before they sleep. And the Vermont Public Service Board should establish standards that reflect those promises.

Annette Smith is executive director of Vermonters for a Clean Environment, based in Danby.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

A debate on the future of Vt’s house leadership

December 4, 2024
Dear Editor, As we look toward the 2025-2026 biennium, an important conversation is unfolding in Vermont about our state’s leadership in the State House. Previously, the speaker of the House position was selected internally and did not involve Vermont’s voters directly. This year, however, the White River Valley Chamber - in conjunction with the Chandler…

We know healthcare is broken, a new report shows how we can fix it

December 4, 2024
Dear Editor, Those seeking fundamental changes to our hospitals and healthcare systems—including us—were not surprised last month when the state’s hospital trade group pushed back against a legislatively mandated report that concluded serious work needs to be done before our entire healthcare system collapses. In fact, the hospitals were so threatened by change that they…

An answer to Vermont’s housing crisis

December 4, 2024
By Peter G. de Krassel Editor’s note: Peter G. de Krassel is the founder of Breaking Housing Matters and the author of the newly released book “Custom Maid Housing for New World Disorder.” He will host a book signing and presentation regarding innovative housing solutions at the Rutland Free Library on Thursday, Dec. 5 at…

Rutland sets example of how to grow local housing

November 27, 2024
By Angelo Lynn Editor’s note: Angelo Lynn is the editor and publisher of the Addison Independent, a sister publication to the Mountain Times.  An important concept in building new housing was recently articulated by Devon Neary, executive director of the Rutland Regional Planning Commission. “Housing,” he said, “doesn’t just pop up out of nowhere. I…