On April 5, 2017

Vote “No” on Model 1

Dear Editor,

I am a full-time resident of Rochester and would like to continue living here. A decade ago, nobody in town believed we would lose our high school, but the issue was raised due to the decline in the number of students and now it’s inevitable. This upcoming merger would, realistically, put us at the mercy of an administration that would not utilize the school in a consistent way, if this track record of mixed messages is anything to go on. The plan has not been clearly communicated and nobody seems to understand how it would be executed. I have to ask: How much money was paid in postage to send out those brochures to our mailboxes that pushed Model 1 only? Who, exactly, paid for that full-page ad in the paper? Am I off-base for asking these kinds of questions?
There are people who believe strongly in Model 1. Act 46 has thrown many Vermont parents into a challenging predicament and I can understand the need for this town to act fast. I visited my father in Rochester every weekend, and, though I survived the public school system in White River, I would’ve rather been raised here where there would have been less chance of alienation. As a person with special needs (i.e. Asperger’s Syndrome), I can say, without hesitation, that graduating high school was the hardest thing I’ve ever done.
Voting “No” on April 11 is the most sensible option because it would allow us a golden opportunity to make better decisions, economically and educationally. My first thought is to join forces with Stockbridge for pre-K through 6th grade public school and then go for school choice from 7th to 12th grade, which would close the Rochester High School. If we closed the building, kids could have school choice and our property values wouldn’t go down. If the town wanted to, we could collaborate on a plan for an academy that would utilize the school buildings. Then, we could create a school for students with special needs.
My opportunity to excel in public school was hindered. I was never given any choices other than to conform. It is impossible to describe how detrimental it can be for someone in my position to ride a bus for an hour, to-and-from school, every day of the week. I would imagine many students in a similar position would benefit by having more choices. Model 1 will not grant any of those students that opportunity because they are only being given one option. That option would also kill the town. Then, there will be no reason for me, or anyone else for that matter, to stay.
I love Rochester, I care very much about its people, and I hope that everyone will make the right decision to secure a future for it.

Tristan Rich-Goding, Rochester

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Raising the bar for ethics in Killington

May 23, 2025
Dear Editor, As a candidate for the Killington Select Board, I’m running on a commitment to transparency, accountability, and steady leadership. I believe that trust in local government begins with clear standards and clear enforcement. Killington’s current conflict of interest policy, adopted in 2019, provides a useful foundation. However, it lacks the tools to ensure…

Education transformation bill will gut local education

May 21, 2025
Dear Editor, Editor’s note: This is an open letter directed to the Windsor Southeast Supervisory Union (WSESU) communities dated May 19. Similar letters were sent out by many superintendents and school officials including Sherry Sousa at Mountain Views SU in Woodstock.  As you may know, the Vermont House and the Senate have been working on…

Bill Vines for Killington Select Board

May 21, 2025
Dear Editor, Since I announced my candidacy, many residents have spoken to me about their concerns for Killington. Taxes and education funding, for example, are often mentioned. Not surprisingly, everyone agrees that taxes need to be controlled and education funding needs to be solved. Virtually everyone has spoken to me about how the town is…

Must H.454 be medicine that’s too awful to swallow?

May 21, 2025
By Angelo Lynn Editor’s note: Angelo Lynn is the publisher of the Addison Independent, a sister publication of the Mountain Times.  On Thursday, May 15, the Senate Finance Committee gave H.454, the Legislature’s revised school funding bill, its final review and sent it to the full Senate to vote on this week. House and Senate…