On March 8, 2017

Smoke-free outdoor air

Dear Editor,

As evidence of the dangers of secondhand smoke continues to rise, many communities have passed tobacco-free laws that cover outdoor areas such as parks, recreational facilities, beaches, outdoor workplaces, and public events such as county fairs and farmers’ markets. Locally, Rutland City passed a ban on all tobacco products in Rutland City parks in October 2010.

With policies increasing all over the country, many might ask, are we going too far? Is it necessary to create a policy to protect public health?

Exposure to second-hand smoke is linked to a wide range of serious and life threatening health problems including heart disease, cancer, asthma and other respiratory problems. Recent studies have found that outdoor secondhand smoke exposure levels can be significant, particularly when smokers are in close proximity to others.

If only everyone who smokes considered those around them. Unfortunately, that is not always the case. Smoke- and tobacco-free policies help to protect the health of everyone since they limit where someone is able to smoke. For some people, a change in behavior will only occur if a policy is in force.

Outdoor policies that prohibit the use of all tobacco products can help reduce the potential for exposure to dangerous, toxic chemicals, as well as the litter that comes from tobacco products. Policies create healthy spaces where families can play without the threat of exposure to harsh chemicals and potential health problems.

With the warmer weather approaching, people will venture outside to enjoy nature and a healthy breath of fresh air. Communities adopting smoke-free policies are making sure that the air we breathe stays fresh and healthy for years to come.

Tina Van Guilder is program director for the Rutland Area Prevention Coalition

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…