On September 28, 2016

Local cartoons offend readers who criticize lack of evidence, authorship; policies changed

By Polly Lynn Mikula
In last week’s edition, Sept. 21-27, an advertised political cartoon was published that offended many readers. While the cartoon (in addition to all letters and op-eds we publish) does NOT necessarily reflect the opinion of the newspaper or any of its staff members, many readers and businesses were confused about this distinction. For this reason we find it necessary to offer an explanation and update on our policies.
First, policies for submitted content differ from advertising. Submitted content must be authored because we believe that accountability makes for responsible debate. All submissions are printed at the editor’s discretion. Advertisements, on the other hand, are taken for a fee and responsibility of the content resides with the advertiser as along as they do not libel another person or institution.
Second, as a policy we do not censor or discriminate against advertisers or opinion submissions (letters or op-eds) based on their political points of view — for example: ads, letters and op-eds from both Democrats and Republicans have an equal opportunity to appear in the Mountain Times.
That being said, we understand why folks were offended by last week’s political cartoon which ran as a paid advertisement on the opinion pages. The cartoon was a jab at the KPAA and specific businesses without offering facts or explanation, which is the main problem with political cartoons as a genre.
Since publishing last week’s political cartoon paid for by Jim Haff, I have spoken to and researched other local paper’s policies on this matter. Many, including the Addison Independent and Seven Days, have run into similar opposition to local political cartoons in the past and, therefore, rarely include them, opting instead to have articulated debates about local issues through letters to the editor.
Moving forward we will adopt that same policy of not publishing local cartoons and instead encourage our readers to articulate their opposition or support for town policies, local issues and/or comments to the Mountain Times via letters to the editor and/or op-eds.
The opinion page of the Mountain Times will remain an open forum for our community where all viewpoints can be articulated. As has always been, the opinions expressed there do NOT necessarily reflect the opinion of the newspaper or any of its staff members. The only exception to this is when we label an opinion expressly as an “editorial.”

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…