On September 21, 2016

The Minter record vs. the Scott record

Dear Editor,
Sue Minter recently said that she will “support Vermont families and businesses” as governor. However, her record suggests otherwise.
In 2009, Minter voted for the disastrous budget bill. In the middle of the Great Recession, the bill raised income taxes on Vermonters by $26 million, used one-time funds to plug recurring budget holes (which was projected to leave a $208 million shortfall), and cut spending for crucial economic development programs like workforce development, which left 2,200 Vermonters without training opportunities.
She co-sponsored legislation to impose an additional 4 percent gas tax on Vermont consumers. Minter was also the lead sponsor on a proposed “mileage” tax. These two taxes would especially hurt working Vermonters who have to travel to and from work. Minter also co-sponsored a bill to raise income taxes on middle-class Vermonters making between $46,700.00 and $171,950.
So when you hear that Sue Minter supports working Vermonters and families, what do you trust: her rhetoric, or her record?
Phil Scott didn’t support any of these bills. While Minter was proposing tax increases and economic development cuts, Scott introduced legislation to streamline business permitting routes and appeals to improve the economic climate. Scott was a co-sponsor of bipartisan legislation to promote economic development in downtown areas by expanding economic incentives and benefits to town centers. Both of these pieces of legislation were incorporated into law.
Scott also co-sponsored legislation to expand financing to small businesses, enact tax credits for investments in Vermont businesses, create a partnership to invest funds in commercial and agricultural enterprises that enhance economic development, and create a sales tax holiday for certain types of purchases. He voted for similar legislation, which also included a R&D Tax Credit and a Sustainable Technology Export Tax Credit, which passed as part of Act 67. Phil Scott was focused on getting things done to make Vermont more affordable.
So when you enter the voting booth on Nov. 8, ask yourself: will you vote for the Minter record or the Scott record?
Edward Dublois, Manchester

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Closing schools doesn’t fix Vermont’s education affordibility problems

October 30, 2024
By Margaret MacLean Editor’s note: Margaret MacLean, of Peacham, is a retired Vermont teacher and award-winning principal. She is the founding executive director of the Vermont Rural Education Collaborative, a past employee of the Rural School and Community Trust, and served on the Vermont State Board of Education.  Roxbury parents can meet most of the…

Making Vermont a place working families want to call home

October 30, 2024
By Rebecca Holcombe Editor’s note: Rebecca Holcombe is a Vermont Representative from Windsor-Orange 2 who served as the Vermont Secretary of Education from 2014 to 2018. Vermonters suffer from unsustainable increases in the cost of everything from property taxes to healthcare. Too many people are working hard and stretching Social Security checks but still worry…

Don’t be fooled by false promises

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor,  There is no simple solution to the challenges that Vermonters face. There needs to be a delicate balance between what, on the surface, seems like appealing short-term solutions to the cost of living for all Vermonters versus the vision for long-term planning that creates financial stability and growth into the future.  Do not…

Context matters

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor, In an October 23 letter to the Mountain Times, Steve Berry wrote, “John Kerry stated at a World Economic Forum panel, ‘Our First Amendment stands as a major block (to getting things done).’”  You may wonder why Mr. Berry uses such odd syntax, placing part of the quote in parentheses. Maybe it’s because…