On July 28, 2016

Lodging health and safety regulations should apply to all

Dear Editor,

The Vermont Inn and Bed & Breakfast Association brought to my attention on July 19 a consideration from the Vermont Department of Health that would compartmentalize lodging accommodations by size (the number of guest rooms) when it comes to the application of the department’s recently revised health and safety regulations. I do not know all of what’s proposed, but I have gleaned that accommodations of fewer than three rooms may in the future be exempted from meeting the standards the state sets to assure the safety and health of guests.

States the association: “Ironically, one and two bedroom units as it currently stands would be the largest lodging block as a health and safety risk for Vermont tourists as they would be the entities with no formal regulation process in place.”

I am writing to request that any accommodation of any size be required to adhere to the values reflected by a commitment to health and safety to which The Fan House B&B in Barnard, a three-bedroom accommodation, has adhered for the past 13 years. I have happily obliged these regulations outlined by the state and in so doing have assured my guests that they are staying at an accommodation that is safe, clean and food-healthy.

The responsibility of continuing to adhere to regulations, however, should not be a numbers game the state of Vermont plays. A one-bedroom facility should also be asked to adhere to appropriate standards.

Should undue stress regulations-wise be placed on me as the owner of a three-bedroom facility, I will remove myself from the three-bedroom category and simply become a one or two-bedroom facility.

The net result to the state would be fewer reservations and therefore fewer rooms and meals tax dollars that the Fan House pays.

Thank you for adhering to the concept of fairness and to an ongoing commitment to the well-being of visitors to Vermont.

Sara Widness, The Fan House, Barnard, Vt.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Closing schools doesn’t fix Vermont’s education affordibility problems

October 30, 2024
By Margaret MacLean Editor’s note: Margaret MacLean, of Peacham, is a retired Vermont teacher and award-winning principal. She is the founding executive director of the Vermont Rural Education Collaborative, a past employee of the Rural School and Community Trust, and served on the Vermont State Board of Education.  Roxbury parents can meet most of the…

Making Vermont a place working families want to call home

October 30, 2024
By Rebecca Holcombe Editor’s note: Rebecca Holcombe is a Vermont Representative from Windsor-Orange 2 who served as the Vermont Secretary of Education from 2014 to 2018. Vermonters suffer from unsustainable increases in the cost of everything from property taxes to healthcare. Too many people are working hard and stretching Social Security checks but still worry…

Don’t be fooled by false promises

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor,  There is no simple solution to the challenges that Vermonters face. There needs to be a delicate balance between what, on the surface, seems like appealing short-term solutions to the cost of living for all Vermonters versus the vision for long-term planning that creates financial stability and growth into the future.  Do not…

Context matters

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor, In an October 23 letter to the Mountain Times, Steve Berry wrote, “John Kerry stated at a World Economic Forum panel, ‘Our First Amendment stands as a major block (to getting things done).’”  You may wonder why Mr. Berry uses such odd syntax, placing part of the quote in parentheses. Maybe it’s because…