On July 21, 2016

Rutland First is pro-democracy, pro-transparency

Dear Editor,

I am a Rutland City resident, registered voter and taxpayer. Kudos to Rutland First for standing up for everyday citizens like me, and to the Board of Aldermen for asserting their authority as our representatives by sending the letter.

Rutland First is concerned that public discussion on the refugee matter and authority for the agreement has been denied by the secretive actions of Mayor Louras and VRRP. Rutland First is not anti-refugee, but is pro-democracy and pro-transparency. There are valid concerns about this program, which have not been satisfactorily addressed by the mayor or VRRP—both of whom are self-interested parties.

Vocal members of Rutland Welcomes, the mayor’s cheerleading squad, are intolerant of an opposing view. This was on full display at the July 5 Board of Aldermen meeting. Rutland Welcomes leaders chastised the Board of Aldermen for standing up for their legal authority. Others who claimed to have moved to Rutland voluntarily described our community as small-minded and uncaring, which is untrue. On social media they have called citizens like me bigots and racists because we are demanding facts. The mayor also called opponents by those names. I am disheartened by these behaviors.

More upsetting to me than the name calling is the fact that Rutland Welcomes is a group made up of mostly out-of-towners—only 15 percent of the 1,200 members are Rutland City registered voters. Rutland City will be most impacted by this program. The petition was signed by 1,200 people of whom 67 percent are Rutland City registered voters. The mayor’s closest advisors, Steve Costello and Joe Kraus, live outside of the City. It makes me wonder if Rutland Welcomes is a front for those who have a financial stake in the refugee transaction.

Sandie Loseby, Rutland City

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Study reveals flaws with “Best Practices” for trapping

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, A new peer reviewed paper, “Best Management Practices for Furbearer Trapping Derived from Poor and Misleading Science,” was recently published and debunks Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s  attempt to convince the public that “Best Management Practices” for trapping result in more humane trapping practices. They don’t. In 2022 there was a bill to ban leghold traps—a straight-forward bill that…

Criminalization is not a solution to homelessness

July 24, 2024
By Frank Knaack and Falko Schilling Editor’s note: This commentary is by Frank Knaack, executive director of the Housing and Homelessness Alliance of Vermont, and Falko Schilling, advocacy director of the ACLU of Vermont. Homelessness in Vermont is at its highest level on record, as more people struggle to afford sky high-rents and housing costs. According…

Open Primaries: Free andfair elections?

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, I don’t know where the idea of open primaries came from or the history of how they began in Vermont. I was originally from Connecticut and when you registered to vote you had to declare your party affiliation. Only if you were registered in a political party, could you take part in that…

The arc of agingand leadership

July 24, 2024
By Bill Schubart Like a good novel, our lives have a narrative arc, during which we are actively participating in and relevant to our world. We are born, rise slowly into sensual consciousness and gradually process what we see and feel. Our juvenile perceptions gradually become knowledge, and, if all goes well, that knowledge binds…