On July 21, 2016

Rutland First is pro-democracy, pro-transparency

Dear Editor,

I am a Rutland City resident, registered voter and taxpayer. Kudos to Rutland First for standing up for everyday citizens like me, and to the Board of Aldermen for asserting their authority as our representatives by sending the letter.

Rutland First is concerned that public discussion on the refugee matter and authority for the agreement has been denied by the secretive actions of Mayor Louras and VRRP. Rutland First is not anti-refugee, but is pro-democracy and pro-transparency. There are valid concerns about this program, which have not been satisfactorily addressed by the mayor or VRRP—both of whom are self-interested parties.

Vocal members of Rutland Welcomes, the mayor’s cheerleading squad, are intolerant of an opposing view. This was on full display at the July 5 Board of Aldermen meeting. Rutland Welcomes leaders chastised the Board of Aldermen for standing up for their legal authority. Others who claimed to have moved to Rutland voluntarily described our community as small-minded and uncaring, which is untrue. On social media they have called citizens like me bigots and racists because we are demanding facts. The mayor also called opponents by those names. I am disheartened by these behaviors.

More upsetting to me than the name calling is the fact that Rutland Welcomes is a group made up of mostly out-of-towners—only 15 percent of the 1,200 members are Rutland City registered voters. Rutland City will be most impacted by this program. The petition was signed by 1,200 people of whom 67 percent are Rutland City registered voters. The mayor’s closest advisors, Steve Costello and Joe Kraus, live outside of the City. It makes me wonder if Rutland Welcomes is a front for those who have a financial stake in the refugee transaction.

Sandie Loseby, Rutland City

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Clean Heat Standard is just too expensive

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, In last week’s article by James Kent, “House Republicans mull a plan to repeal the environmental Clean Heat Standard,” he incorrectly suggests the cost impact on heating fuel is only a couple of cents per gallon, citing a report by Energy Futures. We wish that were true, but unfortunately it is not. Act…

Affordability and a healthy environment can coexist

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, As 2024 draws to a close, I resolve to start the new year with optimism and determination to protect what we care about. Our shared connection to the natural world lies at the heart of Vermont’s identity. We love the beauty and bounty of our state. We also know that a healthy environment…

Let’s welcome asylum seekers

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, Picture a young woman, nine months pregnant, compelled by forces beyond her control to leave home and make an arduous journey with her betrothed to a foreign land, unsure of their welcome there. At this time of year, most of us raised in the Christian tradition would pretty immediately, if unconsciously, imagine this…

Balancing public interests in wildlife policy

December 26, 2024
Dear Editor, Let’s look at the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Board and Department and tell me if it needs modernizing. And for those unaware, the Board is a 14-member volunteer group comprising hunters, trappers, hound hunters, and anglers from every county. The Board makes public policy decisions on our shared public wildlife without fair representation…