On July 21, 2016

On the other side of the tax sensitivity cliff

Dear Editor,

I agree totally with the Jon Margolis op-ed, published in the Mountain Times July 13 -19, but I don’t think the millionaires who were described in the article are the ‘rich’ that a lot of people are talking about. Those whose annual income is in the $75,000 to $150,000 range are considered to be rich by many people. And those ‘rich’ people are under great pressure to sell and move out.

The tax burden for those ‘rich’ is quite heavy. Many IRS deductions are phased out in the bracket above, family and rental property, for example. Then you also have the Vermont property tax sensitivity cliff at $90,000.

To those of you who are unfamiliar with that cliff, I’ll explain. If your household income is $89,999 you get a substantial deduction on your property tax. If you earn $1 more, ($90,000) your property taxes nearly double. In my case, that would be a property tax increase of over $5,000.

Senior retirees are especially hit by these burdens. It’s no wonder why a recent Kiplinger report listed Vermont as the No. 1 least favorable place in the country for seniors.

There are several income speed bumps for seniors. When the IRS taxes Social Security they only tax 85 percent. For example, if you earn $20,000 in Social Security, your IRS taxable amount is $17,000. The same goes for Vermont’s income tax. However, when the household income is calculated, Vermont takes the full $20,000. That effectively reduces the sensitivity cliff to $87,000. I wonder how many seniors have been bushwhacked by that little trick?

If a senior pulls out $10,000 and goes over the sensitivity cliff, the net amount after taxes is pitiful. In my case, if I pull out $5,000, my tax increase is roughly $6,000. Doesn’t make much sense, does it?

So if those income earners need extra cash to pay mortgage, medical, college loans, new cars, whatever, they have to pull out excessive amounts from their retirement accounts which in many cases makes their accounts unsustainable.

If those seniors sell out, more than likely they’ll have to take a hit on the sale price of their home and a really rich person can come in and buy it. That satisfies the portion of the op-ed article that says, “People moving into Vermont were more affluent than people moving out.” I only wish that article took into account those who are forced to move out because they are shafted by Vermont’s tax code.

Stephen Foley, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Closing schools doesn’t fix Vermont’s education affordibility problems

October 30, 2024
By Margaret MacLean Editor’s note: Margaret MacLean, of Peacham, is a retired Vermont teacher and award-winning principal. She is the founding executive director of the Vermont Rural Education Collaborative, a past employee of the Rural School and Community Trust, and served on the Vermont State Board of Education.  Roxbury parents can meet most of the…

Making Vermont a place working families want to call home

October 30, 2024
By Rebecca Holcombe Editor’s note: Rebecca Holcombe is a Vermont Representative from Windsor-Orange 2 who served as the Vermont Secretary of Education from 2014 to 2018. Vermonters suffer from unsustainable increases in the cost of everything from property taxes to healthcare. Too many people are working hard and stretching Social Security checks but still worry…

Don’t be fooled by false promises

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor,  There is no simple solution to the challenges that Vermonters face. There needs to be a delicate balance between what, on the surface, seems like appealing short-term solutions to the cost of living for all Vermonters versus the vision for long-term planning that creates financial stability and growth into the future.  Do not…

Context matters

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor, In an October 23 letter to the Mountain Times, Steve Berry wrote, “John Kerry stated at a World Economic Forum panel, ‘Our First Amendment stands as a major block (to getting things done).’”  You may wonder why Mr. Berry uses such odd syntax, placing part of the quote in parentheses. Maybe it’s because…