On June 23, 2016

Deliberate surprise is undemocratic

Dear Editor,
The majority of the citizens who I hear oppose the refugee relocation program for Rutland are afraid to speak up or be branded “phobes” and bigots . . . nasty politics. The people are not opposed to humanitarian efforts or persons of cultural difference. It’s the lack of democratic process that angers them.
Representatives from the Vermont Refugee Resettlement Program (VRRP) have admitted that keeping the plan secret was a mistake. There was no mistake. They didn’t want us to do this right from the beginning. The surprise was deliberate. Almost too late to stop opposition.
It has been shown that nobody but the mayor, his wife, one alderman and a person later appointed to a city position appear on the roster of the initial planning meeting with VRRP held Jan. 14, 2016. The police chief, fire chief, DPW head, city planners and city workers were entirely left out of the process during the 15 weeks up to the April 26th announcement . . . unimaginable!
Nor has there been disclosure of the potential costs to the city and to the city taxpayers.
Let’s have neighborhood meetings. Let’s see a real impact study, with real budgets, real tax implications, as well as realistic concerns for the impact upon the people who might be relocated here this year and into the future.
The only winner in this hurry up procedure is VRRP from Burlington, Vt., under contract from U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI) of Arlington, Va. Both non-government organizations who get paid “by the head” for every transplant they place here. Not good!
Peace!
Royal Barnard, Rutland City

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…