On June 15, 2016

Understanding the budget 

By Andrew A. Pallito

It is the end of another legislative session and the beginning of another campaign season.  As with all campaign seasons, the State’s budget will likely become a topic of debate and conversation. Vermont, unlike most states, does not have a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget. However, Vermonters still expect fiscal responsibility from state government.  Even in difficult times, such as the Great Recession and Tropical Storm Irene, the state has continuously refused to run a deficit.  Moreover, Vermont has fully funded rainy day funds, and has refused to tap them during difficult budget periods.

Historically, Vermont has managed to balance its budget through tools such as one-time money.  This includes using federal stimulus funds, which were used to help dig Vermont out from the Great Recession, federal funds from FEMA received to help with Irene recovery, and federal funds to help Vermont with the expensive mandates required by the Affordable Care Act.  The budget signed into law this year is the first budget since at least 2009 that does not rely on the use of one-time funds for ongoing state expenses—a practice that leaves Vermont subject to the whims of the federal government and its budget process which, at best, is unpredictable.

This Administration has consistently made it clear that it would not increase certain broad-based taxes that could be counterproductive to Vermont’s economy. For the sixth budget in a row this Administration refused to burden Vermonters by raising income, sales, or rooms and meals tax rates on working Vermonters who can’t afford it. While true that this year’s budget raised certain fees in order to balance the budget, some of these fees have not been revised in a number of years. It is our collective responsibility to revisit fees annually to ensure that the fees match the cost to administer the associated program or keeps pace with activity in neighboring states.

In terms of budget growth, since 2012, the compounded annual growth rate of Vermont’s total budget is 3.7 percent while Vermont’s economy, defined as the Vermont Gross State Product, has grown at 3.1 percent.

One of the difficulties in having budget discussions and making comparisons is the lack of an agreed upon measurement of growth. When I was the commissioner of the Department of Corrections, the same issue existed regarding the lack of one defined measure for criminal justice services, commonly known as recidivism. In the end, the Legislature adopted a statutorily defined recidivism measure. This created a common measurement to monitor and have discussions regarding programmatic success or failure across the system.

As an accountant, it is my opinion that the best measure of Vermont’s budget growth is a “compounded annual growth rate” calculated on Vermont’s budget using all of the funds the state has at its disposal; this includes the state’s General Fund, the Education Fund, Enterprise Funds, the Transportation Fund, Special Funds, and all federal funds. This all-funds approach accurately measures total state spending and is blind to changes in the availability of federal funds and annual variability in individual revenue sources. Total state spending accurately reflects the purpose of the state budget and the true cost to provide the state government services to Vermonters.

As Vermonters, the budget is important to all of us; as we continue to discuss the state’s budget, it is important to remember the historical context that drives budgetary choices over the course of any governorship.

Understanding those choices and explaining them using consistent terminology and indicators is necessary to ensure that our conversations are accurate.

Ultimately, the budget, as proposed by the governor and passed by the Legislature is the financial plan for the real work of government–providing the means to protect our most vulnerable citizens and communities, grow jobs, teach our children, build and maintain roads, and keep Vermonters warm through the long winter season.

Andrew A. Pallito is commissioner for the Vermont Department of Finance & Management

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The magical mythical equalized pupil

May 15, 2024
By Tom Evslin Editor’s note: Tom Evslin, of Stowe, is a retired high-tech entrepreneur. He served as transportation secretary for Gov. Richard Snelling and stimulus czar for Gov. Jim Douglas. The Vermont Legislature is playing an expensive shell game — and planning worse. The “equalized pupil” is the shell under which the pea is hidden.…

Tell the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to protect the Connecticut River

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, It has been 12 years since the relicensing process began for five hydroelectric facilities on the Connecticut River, and until May 22, there is an opportunity to comment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  The last time these hydro facilities were licensed was in 1979, and once the new licenses are issued,…

UVM, don’t punish student protesters

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, As a pastor, I feel it is my professional and moral responsibility to speak to the crisis of conscience facing our nation and state. As of this writing, the civilian death toll in Gaza stands at around 34,654 according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. A third of these casualties are children. I do…

H.289: Good intentions on renewables but one big flaw

May 8, 2024
By David Bittersdorf Editor’s note: Dave Blittersdorf is the president of All Earth Renewables in Bristol. The Vermont General Assembly — in attempt to move the state to 100% renewable energy — is making changes to how the state’s utilities buy energy. Within the next couple of weeks, the Senate Natural Resources Committee will consider…