On June 9, 2016

The governor’s veto should be rebuked

Dear Editor,

Bill S. 230 — a bi-partisan piece of compromise legislation that empowers local communities when it comes to siting for energy projects and sets reasonable sound standards for industrial wind projects — was vetoed Monday, June 6, by Governor Shumlin. This bill had input from the governor’s office throughout the entire session, especially in the final hours of law-making, and the bill ultimately passed the house on a unanimous 142-0 vote.

I’m incredibly disappointed in the governor’s decision to veto this bill. I believe he has caved to a platoon of special interests that have, for one reason or another, been able to convince him that whatever specious reasons he might offer for this veto — they are worth overriding the unanimous will of Vermont’s elected representatives.

Attempts will be made this week to either adjust the legislation or (hopefully) override the Governor’s veto. This special session alone will cost taxpayers north of $50k and could open a Pandora’s box of issues that could keep the legislature in session for longer.

Our renewable economy is booming and Vermont should be proud that we have such a robust industry that it requires passionate debate. But I believe Mr. Shumlin is directly negating the will of Vermont(ers) with this action and I am eager to see the legislature use its constitutional authority to rebuke this veto for the obvious pandering to special interests that it is.

You can count on me,

Job Tate

State representative for Chittenden, Mendon, Killington and Bridgewater

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…