On June 7, 2016

Charges should be dropped against Mosher

Dear Editor,

The criminal charges filed by the Rutland State’s Attorneys Office against Mr. Mosher are overreaching and should be totally dropped. An involuntary manslaughter charge (felony) against the responsible owner of a cow killed by a car—in light of strong facts suggesting fault may lie with the auto driver—seems very unreasonable.

As a Killington property owner, I urge Attorney General Sorrell to personally investigate this matter and use his skills to craft a reasonable solution—including one that instructs the State’s Attorney who filed the case to drop all the charges.

Why? Craig Mosher acts, and acted, in a practical and reasonable manner with respect to managing his livestock. As someone who drives by his location on more or less a daily basis between October and May each year, I find that the street lighting is bright and the fences and animals are well kept.

More importantly, Mr. Mosher is a local business owner and hero.

Simply put, punishing a leader and economic creator after losing his cow to a car driven by a third party at a high speed is inconsistent with Vermont values.

In fact, Mr. Mosher really knows Vermont values. During the aftermath of Hurricane Irene, for example, without the tireless services of Mr. Mosher, Killington would have spent even more than the three weeks with no road access via Route 4 in and out of town. Mr. Mosher and his team can be seen fixing roads and bridges daily in the Killington region.

Please note, I have never met Mr. Mosher personally. After following his case in the media, I decided to reach out due to the serious charges brought by the State’s Attorneys Office.

Finally, as a fellow lawyer with material courtroom and educational experiences (i.e. successfully concluding a case in front of Chief Judge Christina Reis in Rutland Federal Court and educational training at the Vermont Law School and Cornell University), the charges here far exceed the facts and circumstances.

Accordingly, the case should be dropped.

Respectfully submitted, Gabriel M. Selig, Esq. (Cornell University Class of 1989), Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The magical mythical equalized pupil

May 15, 2024
By Tom Evslin Editor’s note: Tom Evslin, of Stowe, is a retired high-tech entrepreneur. He served as transportation secretary for Gov. Richard Snelling and stimulus czar for Gov. Jim Douglas. The Vermont Legislature is playing an expensive shell game — and planning worse. The “equalized pupil” is the shell under which the pea is hidden.…

Tell the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to protect the Connecticut River

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, It has been 12 years since the relicensing process began for five hydroelectric facilities on the Connecticut River, and until May 22, there is an opportunity to comment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  The last time these hydro facilities were licensed was in 1979, and once the new licenses are issued,…

UVM, don’t punish student protesters

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, As a pastor, I feel it is my professional and moral responsibility to speak to the crisis of conscience facing our nation and state. As of this writing, the civilian death toll in Gaza stands at around 34,654 according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. A third of these casualties are children. I do…

H.289: Good intentions on renewables but one big flaw

May 8, 2024
By David Bittersdorf Editor’s note: Dave Blittersdorf is the president of All Earth Renewables in Bristol. The Vermont General Assembly — in attempt to move the state to 100% renewable energy — is making changes to how the state’s utilities buy energy. Within the next couple of weeks, the Senate Natural Resources Committee will consider…