On March 9, 2016

Vermont’s right to know is under attack

By Gov. Peter Shumlin

I’ll admit that I don’t understand how Washington D.C. and Congress work most of the time. For years, Republicans in Congress have thrust the institution into perpetual gridlock, so much so that it struggles to fulfill its most basic responsibilities. Even after the death of a Supreme Court Justice, Senate Republicans are refusing to even hold hearings on a replacement. So it is surprising, to say the least, that Congress is now looking like it might actually do something. Unfortunately that something would be to ban Vermont from enacting our law to require labeling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to ensure our citizens have the right to know what is in their food.

The irony here is that Congress’s failure to take meaningful action in the first place prompted consumers to demand that Vermont step up. The idea is a simple one: Vermonters should have the right to know what is in the food they buy. We already require food companies to label nutritional values like calories or sugar content and to include an ingredient list. Over 64 countries already require GMO labeling. At the end of the day, it’s kind of a no-brainer. Companies like Campbell’s Soup and General Mills, with its Cheerios brand, have voluntarily labeled their products, acknowledging the fact that consumers are demanding transparency.

But Congress has failed to act and help secure for Americans this important consumer right. As they do from time to time, states have stepped into the void to take action. In the past decade, countless ballot measures and 70 bills have been introduced in over 30 states that would require labeling. Congress, however, was too busy voting to repeal Obamacare for the 13th time and shutting down the government to act. Nothing happened.

So Vermont said enough. In 2014, the Legislature passed and I proudly signed a law requiring GMO labeling in our state starting on July 1, 2016. Right on cue, Vermont was sued by Monsanto and its corporate allies who are more worried about their bottom line than telling consumers what is in the food they are selling.

Vermont wasn’t intimidated; our little state kept fighting on. Just last summer, we won an important battle when U.S. District Court Judge Christina Reiss denied the attempt to prevent Vermont’s law from going into effect while the suit works its way through the courts. This was a preliminary victory, meaning Vermont’s law will currently go into effect in just over four months.

Shocked, Monsanto and their cronies called on a reliable ally: the United States Congress. Last summer, the Republican House passed the DARK Act, which would prevent Vermont from implementing its law. And this week, the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee passed a bill that would do the same thing. It’s late in the fourth quarter and those against Vermont’s right to know just threw a Hail Mary.

Luckily, Vermont has a good defense with our best congressional delegation in America. Senators Patrick Leahy and Bernie Sanders and Congressman Peter Welch are on the right side of this issue. But Monsanto and their corporate allies are powerful and there is no telling what the Republican-controlled Congress might do.

It is highly ironic that the Republican Congress is all for state’s rights, just not when it comes to issues like allowing women to make their own health care decisions or giving people the right to know what is in the food they buy.

If Congress wants to spend its time fighting with one another rather than making laws to respond to concerns of the American people, that is the unfortunate prerogative of its members. But Congress should not drag states down with it by denying us the ability to make laws where they won’t.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Study reveals flaws with “Best Practices” for trapping

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, A new peer reviewed paper, “Best Management Practices for Furbearer Trapping Derived from Poor and Misleading Science,” was recently published and debunks Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s  attempt to convince the public that “Best Management Practices” for trapping result in more humane trapping practices. They don’t. In 2022 there was a bill to ban leghold traps—a straight-forward bill that…

Criminalization is not a solution to homelessness

July 24, 2024
By Frank Knaack and Falko Schilling Editor’s note: This commentary is by Frank Knaack, executive director of the Housing and Homelessness Alliance of Vermont, and Falko Schilling, advocacy director of the ACLU of Vermont. Homelessness in Vermont is at its highest level on record, as more people struggle to afford sky high-rents and housing costs. According…

Open Primaries: Free andfair elections?

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, I don’t know where the idea of open primaries came from or the history of how they began in Vermont. I was originally from Connecticut and when you registered to vote you had to declare your party affiliation. Only if you were registered in a political party, could you take part in that…

The arc of agingand leadership

July 24, 2024
By Bill Schubart Like a good novel, our lives have a narrative arc, during which we are actively participating in and relevant to our world. We are born, rise slowly into sensual consciousness and gradually process what we see and feel. Our juvenile perceptions gradually become knowledge, and, if all goes well, that knowledge binds…