On March 9, 2016

Legalizing pot to finance the battle against opiates?

Dear Editor,

The article “Senate OK’s marijuana legalization bill” by Elizabeth Hewitt and Mark Johnson in the March 2-8 edition of The Mountain Times certainly grabbed my attention!

With full disclosure, I admit (and apologize) today for having been a part of that late ‘60s college “culture” that probably began this snow-balling predicament. The slogan “Tune-in, Turn-on and Drop-out” had a catchy ring to it (then).

Today, I hear only the potentially addictive ring and worry. A 35-year career working as a licensed psychologist with emotionally and behaviorally challenged children creates a much more “sober” perspective. The idea that legalizing marijuana could somehow help finance the battle against opiates is like giving Ouroboros (Greek for ‘tail devourer,’ an ancient symbol depicting a serpent or dragon eating its own tail) another length of his own tail to consume.

Let’s not kid ourselves: this is just a rationalization. Such a maneuver is at best a slippery slope. The downside risk is simply not worth it and it does communicate a double-standard, which will lead to even more rationalizing among users.

If we know that we have an opiate crisis, then call it for what it is and fund it accordingly.

Rather than “taking the easy way out” the “best cures” will always involve some degree of work. When I speak to kids and adults these days, I stress heart-healthy activities, telling them: “If you get yourself hooked on endorphins, you won’t need to spend money talking to a guy like me!”

Today, the ‘60s culture is a distant memory. Instead, you are more likely to find me running up the Killington Access Road early in the morning, all year round in all kinds of weather.

If you happen to be up at K-1 around 7:30 a.m. say “hi” to the old man. In the meantime, please urge folks NOT to take this step.

Stephen O. Jambor, Ph.D., Brandon

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Addressing affordability: Why fossil fuels are not the answer

January 29, 2025
Dear Editor, Nearly all Vermonters agree we want living in our state to be more affordable. When it comes to energy, continued dependence on high-cost and price-volatile fossil fuels like gasoline, fuel oil, and propane is not a path to affordability. In 2023, $2.2 billion was spent on fossil fuels for transportation and heating in…

Unaffordable Housing I:Rent-fixing

January 29, 2025
Dear Editor, Back in February 2024, Vermont Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) introduced a bill, “Preventing Algorithmic Facilitation of Rental Housing Cartels.” What does the bill’s name translate to in plain English? Rent-fixing. In a press release dated Aug. 23, 2024, the U.S. Dept.  of Justice (DOJ) announced it, along with…

Meeting the moment to build more housing

January 29, 2025
By  Lindsay Kurrie Editor’s note: Lindsay Kurrie is the secretary of the Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development. This is a pivotal moment in the history of Vermont that will determine our future. It’s imperative we all realize that housing is the foundation of how we will meet this moment to create the momentum…

The great housing development divide

January 22, 2025
The State of Vermont is one of the biggest housing developers in the state. Seven state departments qualify as housing developers, and the University of Vermont is a housing developer. Seven public housing authorities also qualify as housing developers. Add to the list the seven homeownership organizations that are housing developers, and then there are…