On January 15, 2016

Won’t you be my neighbor?

Dear Editor,

Will the town of Killington consider a residency requirement for the new town manager?

In the old days, selectmen ran towns but 100 years ago the state of Vermont created the select board-manager form of government. After the town of Killington (then Sherburne) adopted the newfangled management style the first two officials were or became residents, but the last three managers commuted from away. For a very long time an unelected non-resident has discharged the legal responsibilities of the Selectmen. No reflection on them personally, but one has to ask how well this arrangement served the people of Killington for the past two generations?

There are arguments pro and con but it stands to reason that residency affects a leader. Any civil rights and constitutional challenges to residency (right to travel, equal protection for non-residents, etc.) can be overcome as long as reasonable requirements are implemented legally.

About 20 percent of Vermont towns have managers and the state does not require residency but some towns do, by charter. The town of Killington has decided not to govern by charter for the time being (all cities, 44 towns and 25 villages do: see list at legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/title/24APPENDIX) but we could, by contract with the new manager, try something closer to home rule for a while.

We are offering to pay the manager over $100,000 including benefits; high cost of real estate is no longer an excuse, if it ever was. Why not take this opportunity to grow our shrinking population and collective wealth? The civic leaders could, of course, pick a resident or the new manager from outside town, but then they could move here–problem solved.

Kip Dalury, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…