On January 15, 2016

VPIRG discredited carbon tax petition drive

Dear Editor,

We would like to bring to your attention some concerns we have with a petition drive by Energy Independent Vermont and VPIRG (Vermont Public Interest Research Group), that took place in the summer of 2015. The group that was canvassing towns were asking folks to support a statement on post cards that would be sent to their State Representative, while also soliciting money for VPIRG. Among other things the postcards stated, “I urge you to take action by putting a price on carbon pollution and creating an Energy Independence Fund to help us save money, reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and create jobs.”

Not knowing what exactly was said regarding a carbon tax to our constituents, makes it hard to respond.

However, if you would like to see how complicated a carbon tax might be, please look at the proposed Legislation H.412: https://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Documents/2016/Docs/BILLS/H-0412/H-0412%20As%20Introduced.pdf

The letter that accompanied the postcards stated,”On behalf of Energy Independent Vermont, please find enclosed postcards signed by your constituents calling for bold action on global warming.” These postcards were not signed and there wasn’t a designated place for a signature. Important because, after making many calls to folks on the cards that had phone numbers recorded, we found a disturbing number of folks that had no idea what we were talking about. Many had concerns that their name, phone number and address had been used. Others were Canadian citizens and some had no phone number or address. As Legislators, we are inundated with information and surveys on different topics from lobbyists and advocacy groups. We do our best to assess the accuracy and intent of the information and how it will affect our constituents when proposing or debating legislation. A petition drive such as this, after finding so many of our constituents not knowing about it, not approving of the intent and not allowing their names to be used, in our minds has been discredited. Because this petition has been discredited by us, we feel VPIRG and other groups should not be using the petition numbers to promote their legislative agenda. At the least, the legitimacy of the folks that may approve of such a concept has been lost with our findings.

While VPIRG and the groups that make up Energy Independent Vermont have the  resources to pay for such a canvassing campaign in our neighborhoods, they must also have the social responsibility to see that their compiled data is accurate.


Rep. Mark Higley and Rep. Larry Fiske.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The magical mythical equalized pupil

May 15, 2024
By Tom Evslin Editor’s note: Tom Evslin, of Stowe, is a retired high-tech entrepreneur. He served as transportation secretary for Gov. Richard Snelling and stimulus czar for Gov. Jim Douglas. The Vermont Legislature is playing an expensive shell game — and planning worse. The “equalized pupil” is the shell under which the pea is hidden.…

Tell the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to protect the Connecticut River

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, It has been 12 years since the relicensing process began for five hydroelectric facilities on the Connecticut River, and until May 22, there is an opportunity to comment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  The last time these hydro facilities were licensed was in 1979, and once the new licenses are issued,…

UVM, don’t punish student protesters

May 15, 2024
Dear Editor, As a pastor, I feel it is my professional and moral responsibility to speak to the crisis of conscience facing our nation and state. As of this writing, the civilian death toll in Gaza stands at around 34,654 according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. A third of these casualties are children. I do…

H.289: Good intentions on renewables but one big flaw

May 8, 2024
By David Bittersdorf Editor’s note: Dave Blittersdorf is the president of All Earth Renewables in Bristol. The Vermont General Assembly — in attempt to move the state to 100% renewable energy — is making changes to how the state’s utilities buy energy. Within the next couple of weeks, the Senate Natural Resources Committee will consider…