On December 21, 2015

Stop educating students for jobs that won’t exist

Technology will increasingly provide efficiencies—plan accordingly

By Alan Shusterman

The robots are coming—and they may put your friendly neighborhood retail staffer out of work.

Home-improvement superstore Lowe’s recently began employing robot sales assistants in its stores. The robots can answer questions in multiple languages and take customers directly to what they’re looking for.

Lowe’s isn’t alone. In hotels, hospitals, restaurants, and newsrooms, robots are taking jobs from humans. Johnson & Johnson, for example, recently won FDA approval for Sedasys, which automates anesthesia for procedures like colonoscopies. Momentum Machines has developed a robot that can make a gourmet hamburger in 10 seconds. A hotel in Silicon Valley uses a robot bellhop to deliver luggage to guests’ rooms. There’s no question that advances in robotics and artificial intelligence will have a significant impact on the labor force—and not just for blue-collar workers.

Unfortunately, America’s schools haven’t been paying attention. They’re still using outdated methods to train students for the very jobs the robots are taking. Our schools must start teaching children skills that robots can’t emulate, like emotional intelligence and problem-solving.

One-third of today’s jobs are predicted to be replaced by machines by 2025. University of Oxford researchers think that number will reach 47 percent by 2033. Will all this lead to a dystopian future, with massive unemployment and the machines in charge?

If history is any guide, the answer is no. Agricultural technology allowed farmers to produce far more while employing fewer people. Office computers made armies of stenographers obsolete. But each “job-killing” technological advance also greatly increased productivity and created new job opportunities.

Rather than fight the future, schools should prepare the next generation of workers for it. That future will require workers to think creatively, deepen their emotional IQ, and integrate technology into everything they do. Schools should address the learning priorities of the future in three major ways.

First, they can embrace project-based learning, which empowers students to develop their creativity and problem-solving skills. Students might be asked to develop public-health responses to disease outbreaks or conduct an archaeological dig. These sorts of tasks have far too many variables for even the best artificial intelligence to handle.

Second, schools can use social-emotional learning to improve students’ emotional intelligence. The approach teaches students how to better understand emotions, develop empathy, foster positive relationships, and make responsible decisions.

For example, the “4Rs Program” (Reading, Writing, Respect, and Resolution) incorporates emotional intelligence training and conflict resolution into language arts classes. Students in the program use books to discuss conflict resolution, perspective-taking, and more. Research shows that these students exhibit less aggressive behavior, are more socially competent, and experience fewer depressive and ADHD symptoms.

These social-emotional skills won’t soon be replicated by robots. Even the most sophisticated android won’t soon be able to express excitement about a product when trying to make a sale or recognize when a colleague is being overworked.

Finally, if we’re to beat the robots, we’re going to have to join them — or at least know how to work with them. That means doing more than just sticking technology haphazardly in classrooms. To truly prepare students, schools must make tech an integral part of assignments. In the future, technology—robots included—will become an even more common part of the workplace. Employees will have to understand that technology to succeed.

Schools must change to prepare students for this future—rather than continuing to educate them for jobs that won’t exist.

Alan Shusterman is the founder and head of School for Tomorrow, a Silver Spring, Maryland-based nonprofit, independent school for grades 4 through 12.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Study reveals flaws with “Best Practices” for trapping

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, A new peer reviewed paper, “Best Management Practices for Furbearer Trapping Derived from Poor and Misleading Science,” was recently published and debunks Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s  attempt to convince the public that “Best Management Practices” for trapping result in more humane trapping practices. They don’t. In 2022 there was a bill to ban leghold traps—a straight-forward bill that…

Criminalization is not a solution to homelessness

July 24, 2024
By Frank Knaack and Falko Schilling Editor’s note: This commentary is by Frank Knaack, executive director of the Housing and Homelessness Alliance of Vermont, and Falko Schilling, advocacy director of the ACLU of Vermont. Homelessness in Vermont is at its highest level on record, as more people struggle to afford sky high-rents and housing costs. According…

Open Primaries: Free andfair elections?

July 24, 2024
Dear Editor, I don’t know where the idea of open primaries came from or the history of how they began in Vermont. I was originally from Connecticut and when you registered to vote you had to declare your party affiliation. Only if you were registered in a political party, could you take part in that…

The arc of agingand leadership

July 24, 2024
By Bill Schubart Like a good novel, our lives have a narrative arc, during which we are actively participating in and relevant to our world. We are born, rise slowly into sensual consciousness and gradually process what we see and feel. Our juvenile perceptions gradually become knowledge, and, if all goes well, that knowledge binds…