On November 12, 2015

You decide

Dear Editor,

My question on transparency (two books, two reports, two financials) gets really confusing when the town is not using one set of financials for all.

In the 2013 Town Report “Goodnight Irene” on page 5, it states: “By completing construction of new bridges on Stage and Ravine Roads and repairing a series of dry hydrants, we finished our final flood recovery projects. Many of the costs for these projects were not covered by FEMA, so we worked diligently to minimize costs to taxpayers. We collaborated with the Agency of Natural Resources to finalize bridge designs that met their standards and fell within our budgets, and we secured grant money to off-set the cost of the dry hydrants.”

Reading this sounds as if Ravine and Stage were known not to be funded in 2013 and were worked into the budget. Now July 29, 2015, Killington Select Board Chair Patty McGrath addresses flood financing plans and transparency with this response:

“Irene caused just over $3 million in damages. We made all the repairs, rebuilt the damaged infrastructure and paid all the bills. The state and federal governments (primarily FEMA) have reimbursed the town for the projects they deemed eligible, which represent a large majority of the costs of the work to date. The town is waiting for its final reimbursement claim, primarily represented by Stage and Ravine Road bridges. The reason these final claims are outstanding is that the state has been helping make the case that the town should receive more money than FEMA planned.”

While reading this it seems the same bridges are being discussed as not being paid. I thought that these bridges fell within our 2013 budget, according to the Town Report.

Where’s the transparency? Did we pay for the bridges? Or are we still waiting for the funding? We were told that these bridges fell within past budgets, then we were told that we borrowed the money from ourselves. I’ve been asking, “show me where we borrowed from ourselves.”

Jim Haff, Killington.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Closing schools doesn’t fix Vermont’s education affordibility problems

October 30, 2024
By Margaret MacLean Editor’s note: Margaret MacLean, of Peacham, is a retired Vermont teacher and award-winning principal. She is the founding executive director of the Vermont Rural Education Collaborative, a past employee of the Rural School and Community Trust, and served on the Vermont State Board of Education.  Roxbury parents can meet most of the…

Making Vermont a place working families want to call home

October 30, 2024
By Rebecca Holcombe Editor’s note: Rebecca Holcombe is a Vermont Representative from Windsor-Orange 2 who served as the Vermont Secretary of Education from 2014 to 2018. Vermonters suffer from unsustainable increases in the cost of everything from property taxes to healthcare. Too many people are working hard and stretching Social Security checks but still worry…

Don’t be fooled by false promises

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor,  There is no simple solution to the challenges that Vermonters face. There needs to be a delicate balance between what, on the surface, seems like appealing short-term solutions to the cost of living for all Vermonters versus the vision for long-term planning that creates financial stability and growth into the future.  Do not…

Context matters

October 30, 2024
Dear Editor, In an October 23 letter to the Mountain Times, Steve Berry wrote, “John Kerry stated at a World Economic Forum panel, ‘Our First Amendment stands as a major block (to getting things done).’”  You may wonder why Mr. Berry uses such odd syntax, placing part of the quote in parentheses. Maybe it’s because…