On July 2, 2015

When it comes to PEG-TV, Rutland’s gain is Killington’s loss

Dear Editor,

Rutland’s PEG-TV recently announced the retirement of their long time executive director. The three-station juggernaut has been a success that hopefully will continue. They last reported revenues of $750,000 and $1.4 million in assets with a well-paid and benefitted staff. But that success came in part at great cost to the town of Killington.

Many years ago the town had escrowed over $200,000 of PEG fees from Adelphia. When a group of local residents attempted to set up a station they were rebuffed. Then selectmen, town manager (a Rutlander) and a recently retired Rutland director had other ideas. They decided it best to give all PEG fees, past and future, collected in Killington to the Rutland station–but only after doubling it from 2 ½ to 5 percent.

This was pre-Australian ballot and the voters withheld their support from the startup on the floor at Killington town meeting. We appealed to the Vermont Public Service Board but tax collector Adelphia’s (by then bankrupt) decision was upheld.

Rutland Regional Community Television used the windfall to build new facilities and set up, briefly, a Killington satellite station, which soon folded not because of overfunding. I think Rutland’s station was better located at Stafford Tech where high schoolers were more involved; at least some of them benefitted–Killington students who attend Woodstock never did. Overall it’s been great for Rutland while 5 percent of the Comcast bill gets us minimal Killington Public Educational and Government programming.

Kip Dalury, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The public reality of private schools

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, In their June 13 commentary, “The Achilles’ heel of Vermont education reform,” the Friends of Vermont Public Education state that, “Since the early 1990s, we have been operating two parallel educational systems — public and private.” The organization calls upon the Vermont Legislature to create “one unified educational system,” arguing that, “The current…

Alternative steps for true education reform

June 25, 2025
By Jim Lengel Editor’s note: Jim Lengel, of Duxbury and Lake Elmore, started teaching in Vermont in 1972, worked for the state board of education for 15 years, and retired back in Vermont after helping schools all over the world improve the quality of teaching and learning. Our executive and legislative branches have failed during…

Protect SNAP—because no Vermonter should go hungry

June 25, 2025
Dear Editor, As a longtime anti-hunger advocate, a former SNAP recipient, and a proud Vermonter, I am deeply alarmed by proposals moving through Congress that would gut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known here in Vermont as 3SquaresVT. If passed, these cuts would devastate thousands of families across the Green Mountain State that rely…

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly of H.454

June 25, 2025
By Sen. Ruth Hardy Editor’s note: Ruth Hardy, of East Middlebury, represents Addison County in the Vermont Senate. She wrote the following reflection (originally posted at ruthforvermont.com) on voting “no” on H.454, the eduction transformation reform bill that passed last week.  On Monday, June 16, the Legislature passed H.454, the education transformation bill that was…