On June 17, 2015

Voters at fault for not reining in town spending policies at elections

Dear Editor,

The front page of this past week’s (June 11-17) Mountain Times reported on the first quarter local options tax in the story headlined “Central Vermont towns report good first quarter revenue for local options tax.” In it, Killington town manager reported we took in $483,628. Where does that money go? It goes into the general fund. In comparison, Rutland Town took in $249,327. But they use those monies to reduce property taxes to be applied to their next fiscal year. Our leaders use these funds for consultant fees and studies. We are heavily in debt trying to pay off the golf course, which seems to be never ending. The course needs substantial repairs, the pool needs work. Not one red cent of the revenue from the option tax is used to reduce our taxes. They keep going up, up, up. And while the local businesses enjoy an increase in their bottom line, something that we the town are all in favor of, we the residents receive zero. But whose fault is it? The same 15-20  people show up for the Select Board meetings. The last election only 37 percent of the registered voters went to the polls. “It’s our own damn fault!”

It’s hard to listen to one of our leaders say, “if you don’t like the job we’re doing, you can vote us out of office,” as happened at a recent Select Board meeting. But that, my friends, is exactly what we have to do. You the residents must take a more serious interest in what’s happening to our town. We also need to get the second-homeowners to voice their opinions and concerns. After all they pay taxes, too. We all must get involved if we want change. We can’t leave it to those who appear to be less than interested in performing for the interests of all the people of Killington.

Richard Kropp, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Missing the mark on ed reform

June 11, 2025
Dear Editor, If and when the governor and Legislature agree on something they call “transformational educational reform,” it’s unlikely to be what most people expected or wanted. Vermonters won’t see the property tax relief they were hoping for because changes to the funding system will be a few years off. Instead, the first sign of…

H.454: Another tax hike disguised as funding reform

June 11, 2025
By Ryan Heraty Editor’s note: Ryan Heraty is the superintendent of the Lamoille South Supervisory Union and a doctoral student at the University of Vermont, studying education finance and public policy. Most Vermonters agree our state is facing an affordability crisis, yet few suggest the solution is to raise taxes on low and middle-income Vermonters.…

CHIP is a game changer

June 11, 2025
Dear Editor, Vermont just took a bold, historic step toward solving one of the most urgent issues facing our state: the lack of affordable and attainable homes for Vermonters of all income levels and backgrounds. With the passage of the Community Housing Infrastructure Program (CHIP) during the 2025 legislative session, the state now has a…

Want lower taxes? Then let’s reform education the smart way

June 11, 2025
By Bryce Sammel Editor’s note: Bryce Sammel, of Barnard, previously served on and chaired both the Barnard Academy and Mountain Views school boards. Vermonters are rightly worried about taxes. With rising costs across the board, including property taxes, health care and energy bills, many residents, especially those without school-aged children, are asking a fair question:…