On November 12, 2014

Support modifying the local option tax

Dear Editor,

I’m 72 years “young” and strongly support modification of the Killington Option Tax as suggested by The Resort.

The suggested modification of the option tax is NOT the elimination of the option tax, only the elimination of that portion applicable to sales and use tax.

Because I shop in Killington, a portion of the likely increase in my property tax will be offset by savings on the option tax that I now pay on my phone and cable bills and purchases in Killington like ski equipment and my season pass.

I’ve owned a home in Killington since 1987 and have been a permanent Killington resident for 10 years.

With no pensions, stocks, or bonds, I work part time in order to afford a certain standard of living, including buying an Unlimited Senior Season Pass for Killington.

Paying $ 699 for an Unlimited Senior Season Pass and skiing 40 days last season, that is $ 17.48/day of skiing. Pretty reasonable – yes could be better. That Season Pass by the way afforded me free use of the K 1 Gondola this past summer, something that I used five times.

Enlightened communities – be they towns, cities, states – recognize the value of

“partnering” with for-profit businesses to help grow and improve their respective communities. Frequently the mode of partnering is in tax breaks or the community paying for needed infrastructure associated with a new stadium.

Killington is like a corporate town. A corporate town has many relatively small businesses and one or two relatively large businesses. Quality of life in a corporate town is maximized when citizens and the major business in that town recognize and practice a spirit of “what is good for the Town is good for the business and vice-versa.”

Let’s repeal that portion of the option tax applicable to sales and use.

Bernie Krasnoff, Killington

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Missing the mark on ed reform

June 11, 2025
Dear Editor, If and when the governor and Legislature agree on something they call “transformational educational reform,” it’s unlikely to be what most people expected or wanted. Vermonters won’t see the property tax relief they were hoping for because changes to the funding system will be a few years off. Instead, the first sign of…

H.454: Another tax hike disguised as funding reform

June 11, 2025
By Ryan Heraty Editor’s note: Ryan Heraty is the superintendent of the Lamoille South Supervisory Union and a doctoral student at the University of Vermont, studying education finance and public policy. Most Vermonters agree our state is facing an affordability crisis, yet few suggest the solution is to raise taxes on low and middle-income Vermonters.…

CHIP is a game changer

June 11, 2025
Dear Editor, Vermont just took a bold, historic step toward solving one of the most urgent issues facing our state: the lack of affordable and attainable homes for Vermonters of all income levels and backgrounds. With the passage of the Community Housing Infrastructure Program (CHIP) during the 2025 legislative session, the state now has a…

Want lower taxes? Then let’s reform education the smart way

June 11, 2025
By Bryce Sammel Editor’s note: Bryce Sammel, of Barnard, previously served on and chaired both the Barnard Academy and Mountain Views school boards. Vermonters are rightly worried about taxes. With rising costs across the board, including property taxes, health care and energy bills, many residents, especially those without school-aged children, are asking a fair question:…