On August 1, 2014

FEMA won’t fund rebuilding of culverts

By John Herrick, VTDigger.org

The Obama administration launched an initiative Wednesday, July 16, aimed at helping local communities better prepare for the impacts of climate change, but one of Vermont’s key recommendations to the president was not included.

The state wants to use FEMA public assistance money to help rebuild culverts and bridges so streams pass under the roads instead of washing them out.

But according to FEMA, the state’s engineering plans for these projects do not meet its current uniform “codes and standards” and therefore don’t qualify for public assistance money.

Gov. Peter Shumlin and other state officials are part of the president’s task force, which is charged with recommending ways states can better prepare for natural disasters linked to climate change.

The state this year adopted new Stream Alteration General Permit guidelines, which govern how new projects that impact streams – like roads, bridges and culverts – must be built.

FEMA says the state cannot qualify for public assistance money because the guidelines do not apply “uniformly to all bridge and culvert replacement projects,” according to a recent letter to the state.

Ben Rose, the recovery and mitigation section chief for Vermont Emergency Management and Homeland Security, said the new state standards include replacing smaller pipe culverts with bottomless ones that allow water to flow through smoothly.

The larger culverts cost more upfront, but Rose said they will save taxpayers money in the long run.

“We want to build stuff that’s going to withstand the next flood,” he said.

ANR Secretary Deb Markowitz is one of several state officials who made recommendations to the Obama administration over the past year and was in Washington last week, along with Shumlin and Sue Minter of the state transportation department. Markowitz said making FEMA funding flexible was “very specifically one of the recommendations.”

When FEMA rejected the state’s request to qualify certain projects for public assistance funding, Markowitz said, “We were frankly very surprised.”

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

A debate on the future of Vt’s house leadership

December 4, 2024
Dear Editor, As we look toward the 2025-2026 biennium, an important conversation is unfolding in Vermont about our state’s leadership in the State House. Previously, the speaker of the House position was selected internally and did not involve Vermont’s voters directly. This year, however, the White River Valley Chamber - in conjunction with the Chandler…

We know healthcare is broken, a new report shows how we can fix it

December 4, 2024
Dear Editor, Those seeking fundamental changes to our hospitals and healthcare systems—including us—were not surprised last month when the state’s hospital trade group pushed back against a legislatively mandated report that concluded serious work needs to be done before our entire healthcare system collapses. In fact, the hospitals were so threatened by change that they…

An answer to Vermont’s housing crisis

December 4, 2024
By Peter G. de Krassel Editor’s note: Peter G. de Krassel is the founder of Breaking Housing Matters and the author of the newly released book “Custom Maid Housing for New World Disorder.” He will host a book signing and presentation regarding innovative housing solutions at the Rutland Free Library on Thursday, Dec. 5 at…

Rutland sets example of how to grow local housing

November 27, 2024
By Angelo Lynn Editor’s note: Angelo Lynn is the editor and publisher of the Addison Independent, a sister publication to the Mountain Times.  An important concept in building new housing was recently articulated by Devon Neary, executive director of the Rutland Regional Planning Commission. “Housing,” he said, “doesn’t just pop up out of nowhere. I…