On September 23, 2020

‘There can be no vote’ on a high court pick this year, delegation, governor say

By Anne Galloway/VTDigger

The Vermont congressional delegation and the governor issued statements Friday night, Sept. 18, mourning the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. In the same breath, the two senators and congressional representative decried the news that the Senate majority leader will hold a vote for a Trump nominee to replace her before the end of the year.

Ginsburg, 87, died of metastatic pancreatic cancer Friday evening. RBG, as she was known, was a beloved icon of the feminist movement. The legendary champion of women’s rights was, as Rep. Peter Welch put it, “a titan of jurisprudence.”

“A pioneer from the earliest days of her career, she won a landmark case for women’s rights in 1971, before being appointed to the highest court in the land in 1993,” Welch said. “She served with distinction, never letting her colleagues forget the huge impacts that the law has on the most vulnerable among us.”

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said she was “unmistakably kind and funny, and a fundamentally decent human being.”

Gov. Phil Scott, a Republican, also sang her praises. “She was a tireless advocate for justice and equality, and an example for future generations. There is no doubt she will be missed on the court, and in our national dialogue.”

Two days before she died, she told her granddaughter, “My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”

News of her death had barely registered with the public on Friday when Sen. Mitch McConnell issued a statement vowing to take up President Donald Trump’s nominee regardless of whether he wins re-election.

“Since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president’s Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year,” McConnell wrote. “By contrast, Americans reelected our majority in 2016 and expanded it in 2018 because we pledged to work with President Trump and support his agenda, particularly his outstanding appointments to the federal judiciary.”

“President Trump’s nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate,” he said.

McConnell’s statement is in direct contradiction to his treatment of former President Barack Obama’s pick, Merrick Garland. The senate majority leader refused to consider Garland who was nominated in March 2016, nine months before Obama left office.

At the time, McConnell said, “Give the people a voice in filling this vacancy.”

Leahy said McConnell “must not treat this president’s Supreme Court nominees differently than President Obama’s Supreme Court nominees.”

“They must exhibit a shred of integrity and recognize that abandoning their word now, and breaking all precedents by ramming a nominee through — most likely after the election — would cause the nation tremendous pain,” the senator wrote.

Scott also says the Senate must follow precedent “as well as her dying wishes, and delay the appointment process until after Inauguration Day.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said McConnell “is cementing a shameful legacy of brazen hypocrisy.” The Senate majority leader’s announcement is in “direct contradiction of his statement in 2016, when he said Supreme Court nominees should not be voted on during a presidential election year,” he added.

Sanders said several Republican senators, including Sens. Lisa Murkowski, Chuck Grassley and Susan Collins, have already said they would not vote to confirm a Supreme Court nominee this close to an election.

“The right thing to do here is clear,” Sanders wrote. “The Republicans in the Senate know it, and many of them have stated it clearer than I could. We should let voters decide. Period.”

Welch urged the Senate to apply the “McConnell Standard” and wait until the new year for a vote. “There can be no vote in the Senate until the American people have voted to decide who will nominate and confirm the next Supreme Court Justice,” Welch said.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Two members, including chair, resign from the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont

June 25, 2025
By Corey McDonald/VTDigger Two members of the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont, including the commission’s chair, announced last week they would be resigning, saying they no longer believed their efforts would make any impact. Meagan Roy, the chair of the commission, and Nicole Mace, the former representative of the Vermont School Boards…

Vt plastic bag use dropped 91% following ban, researchers find

June 25, 2025
In the midst of 2020 Covid measures, another change took place in Vermont: A law went into effect banning businesses from offering plastic bags to customers, with paper bags only available for a fee. A 2023 analysis of a survey of hundreds of Vermonters found the law appeared to have worked. Plastic bag use in…

A Roadmap

June 25, 2025
The Vermont Legislature adjourned Monday evening, June 16, following the passage of H.454, the education reform plan. I call it a roadmap as the legislation lays out a list of changes that will take place over the next few years. And as various studies and reports come back in, there will also likely be adjustments,…

Vermont to get over $21 million in nationwide settlement with Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers

June 25, 2025
Attorney General Charity Clark announced June 16 that all 55 attorneys general, representing all eligible states and U.S. territories, have agreed to sign on to a $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma and its owners, the Sackler family. This settlement was reached after the previous settlement was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. It resolves…