On June 10, 2015

Environmental study sees little problem with cable under Lake Champlain

The cable would travel 97.3 miles underneath the lake to Benson, then 56.7 miles to Ludlow

By Morgan True, VTDigger.org

The U.S. Department of Energy has released a draft environmental impact study on a development firm’s proposal to run a 154-mile high-voltage transmission cable beneath Lake Champlain. It would carry electricity from Canada to markets in southern New England and is the first project of this size to be reviewed for environmental impact on the lake, according to state officials.

Federal officials recommend allowing the $1.2 billion project proposed by Champlain VT LLC, d.b.a. TDI New England (Transmission Developers, Inc. of Albany, N.Y.), which builds direct-current power transmission systems, to go forward because it would help meet regional energy needs. The draft study also concluded that the environmental impacts of a high-voltage cable’s construction, operation and maintenance would be minimal.

The cable would originate at the U.S.-Canada border and travel approximately 97.3 miles underneath Lake Champlain to Benson, then travel underground along town and state road and railroad rights-of-way for approximately 56.7 miles to a new converter station that would be built in Ludlow.

The underwater portions of the transmission cable would be buried in the bed of Lake Champlain, with the exception of depths greater than 150 feet, in which case the cables would be placed on the lakebed. Construction would rely on horizontal drilling. The project is expected to be in service in 2019, at a cost of approximately $1.2 billion. The line is being developed with private-sector financing by TDI New England.

Public hearings on the findings will be held July 15 in Burlington and July 16 in Rutland. The public can also submit written comment on the project website. The comment period will last until mid-August.

A special Presidential permit is required. The Presidential permit application and draft environmental impact statement can be viewed and public comments can be made at: https://necplinkeis.com. The website states: “Anyone seeking to construct, operate, maintain, or connect an electric transmission facility crossing the borders of the United States must first obtain a Presidential permit issued by DOE under Executive Order (E.O.) 10485, as amended by E.O. 12038.”

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Two members, including chair, resign from the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont

June 25, 2025
By Corey McDonald/VTDigger Two members of the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont, including the commission’s chair, announced last week they would be resigning, saying they no longer believed their efforts would make any impact. Meagan Roy, the chair of the commission, and Nicole Mace, the former representative of the Vermont School Boards…

Vt plastic bag use dropped 91% following ban, researchers find

June 25, 2025
In the midst of 2020 Covid measures, another change took place in Vermont: A law went into effect banning businesses from offering plastic bags to customers, with paper bags only available for a fee. A 2023 analysis of a survey of hundreds of Vermonters found the law appeared to have worked. Plastic bag use in…

A Roadmap

June 25, 2025
The Vermont Legislature adjourned Monday evening, June 16, following the passage of H.454, the education reform plan. I call it a roadmap as the legislation lays out a list of changes that will take place over the next few years. And as various studies and reports come back in, there will also likely be adjustments,…

Vermont to get over $21 million in nationwide settlement with Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers

June 25, 2025
Attorney General Charity Clark announced June 16 that all 55 attorneys general, representing all eligible states and U.S. territories, have agreed to sign on to a $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma and its owners, the Sackler family. This settlement was reached after the previous settlement was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. It resolves…