On May 30, 2018

Legislative update: To raise or not to raise taxes …That is the question

Portrait of Jim Harrison
Jim Harrison

By Rep. Jim Harrison, Chittenden, Bridgewater, Killington and Mendon

Following vetoes on the $15 minimum wage, paid family leave, increased liability on outdoor recreational operators and medical monitoring, Governor Scott vetoed the education funding and the state budget last Friday, May 25. While the initial bills may have been political statements by the Legislature, it is the property tax and budget bills that prompted the special session.

It all comes down to whether the Legislature and Governor will agree to raise the average statewide property taxes this year or not.

When the Legislature first adjourned on May 12, it sent the governor a tax bill that increases the statewide average property tax rate by 2.6 cents (about $65 on a $250,000 home) and the nonresidential by 5.5 cents. The Governor has been adamant that he would not sign any tax increases this year, hence the standoff.

Prior to the official call for a special session, Scott sent a letter to legislative leadership, insisting the two sides “are very close to an agreement.” Offering a different assessment, Senate President pro tem Tim Ashe said, “Of course, we could maintain last year’s property tax rates that we put in statute. It would just be an ill-advised decision. So you would pour in one-time money, govern on a credit card, and find ourselves back in the same situation next year. That’s what the governor is proposing, which is effectively deficit spending.”

The special session was gaveled in and out on May 23 and will return on May 30. It is anyone’s guess as to whether an agreement to move forward will be reached this week.

The governor and his team suggest that the $34 million they propose to use to keep average property taxes level will be paid back next year as reforms start to take hold. Lawmakers are not convinced, especially as it relates to a goal of increasing pupil to staff ratios.

“Our student numbers, as you might know, are high,” Heather Bouchey told lawmakers. “But we have not seen changes in our staffing levels at that same time. And this just doesn’t make sense, based on pure logic alone.”

Signs of a potential compromise on tax rates surfaced last week when House Committee Chair, Rep. Janet Ancel, D-Calais, suggested using $14 million of this year’s surplus to keep average residential property taxes steady for this year, while allowing nonresidential to go up 5.5 cents.  Rebecca Kelley, a spokesperson for the governor, said that Scott won’t support a proposal that raises nonresidential property tax rates. Scott has been resolute in his no new taxes campaign pledge this biennium.

Vetoed by Governor

S.105 – The bill would have put significant limitations in liability waivers that the outdoor recreation industry commonly utilizes.

S.40 – Increases Vermont’s minimum wage to $15 over 6 years. Legislative leaders never attempted to compromise with the Governor on this one, suggesting the issue was more about politics than policy.

H.196 – A new paid family leave program that would have enabled employees to take paid time off for the birth or adoption of a child (12 weeks) and for caring of a family member (6 weeks). The plan was to be funded by a new payroll tax on all working Vermonters, a nonstarter for Scott.

S.197 – An act relating to liability for toxic substance exposures or releases. In his veto message, Scott said, “The level of liability and uncertainty this legislation creates for employers could prove catastrophic for Vermont’s fragile economy and the bill establishes a standard that does not exist anyplace else in the country.”

H.911 – Increases the statewide property tax rates for education. Now the subject of the special session.

H.924 – State budget. While the legislation passed by overwhelming margins in both chambers, the budget includes allocation of the surplus revenue to the teachers’ retirement fund that the Governor prefers to see utilized to hold down property taxes.

You may reach Jim Harrison at [email protected] or call his cell: 802-236-3001. Messages may also be left at the State House during the legislative session at 802-828-2228. For more information, please visit  harrisonforvermont.com.

Contact your legislators.
Visit: legislature.vermont.gov/people/

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

H.91 would overhaul Vermont’s response to homelessness, dissolving statewide motel program

April 23, 2025
By Carly Berlin/VTDigger This story, by Report for America corps member Carly Berlin, is published via a partnership between VTDigger and Vermont Public. A bill that would fundamentally overhaul Vermont’s response to homelessness is making its way through the Statehouse. H.91 provides a potential off-ramp to the state’s mass use of motel rooms as a…

DMV reminds Vermonters of upcoming REAL ID deadline

April 23, 2025
The Vermont Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is reminding Vermonters that the REAL ID requirement takes effect on May 7, 2025. This means that people aged 18 and older will need a REAL ID-compliant Driver’s License or Identification Card, or another form of identification accepted by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), for domestic air travel and to…

New study shows most Vermonters report good health 

April 23, 2025
Newly released data from the Dept. of Health, April 15, shows that most adults in Vermont report they are in good health, but that education and income levels, disabilities and other factors can lead to stark differences in people’s health.  This data helps state officials and partners monitor trends and prioritize efforts to improve the…

Trade partners

April 23, 2025
For anyone who thinks that what is happening in Washington isn’t having a profound effect on life in Vermont, think again. It began with neighbors being fired from USAID and has evolved into destabilizing commerce with Vermont’s biggest trade partner, Canada. In addition, President Trump’s irresponsible rhetoric about Canada is having a profoundly negative impact…