On April 12, 2017

Hunger Free Vermont warns Trump’s proposed budget would cut assistance

Vermonters struggling to make ends meet can receive wage supports like Low Income Heating Assistance Program (LIHEAP) fuel assistance to help pay for heating expenses—crucial for Vermonters during our cold winter months. This program is also directly linked to the 3SquaresVT program (also known as SNAP or food stamps) and eligible recipients of LIHEAP often receive a higher 3SquaresVT benefit to help make ends meet and put healthy food on the table. Vermont is among 17 states, including New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Oregon, that boosts the amount of 3SquaresVT benefits to those participants that also receive help from the federal LIHEAP, which serves nearly 44,000 households in Vermont. 22,065 of these households receiving LIHEAP are eligible to receive a boost in their 3SquaresVT benefit. 8,602 households include a senior member and 9,732 households include a disabled household member.

Trump’s proposed budget would eliminate all of the programs in the federal Health and Human Service’s Office of Community Services, including LIHEAP. If this cut happens, 22,065 Vermonters will see an average reduction of $60 in their food benefits. Losing $60 of food money a month would be a serious hardship for these families and would likely increase food insecurity across the state—plus all 44,000 Vermont recipients of LIHEAP will have to come up with extra money to pay for heat if the program is cut. With most low-income households running at a deficit each month (for example, a family of four with two working adults each making minimum wage will have an estimated $2,200 monthly shortfall), having their LIHEAP benefit cut, and in many cases their 3SquaresVT budget reduced too, will lead to even that much more food insecurity.

“At Hunger Free Vermont, we know that food is the most flexible part of the family food budget. In our cold winter months, Vermonters need heat and that will often take a priority over food. This means the quality of food can go way down, causing many health issues, and in some cases Vermonters will go without in order to keep the heat on,” said Marissa Parisi, executive director of Hunger Free Vermont. “With some of our most vulnerable—our senior adults, single moms, children, and those with disabilities—in households receiving LIHEAP, it is our responsibility to ensure all our neighbors have the heat and food they need to live, learn, and contribute to our communities.”

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Two members, including chair, resign from the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont

June 25, 2025
By Corey McDonald/VTDigger Two members of the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont, including the commission’s chair, announced last week they would be resigning, saying they no longer believed their efforts would make any impact. Meagan Roy, the chair of the commission, and Nicole Mace, the former representative of the Vermont School Boards…

Vt plastic bag use dropped 91% following ban, researchers find

June 25, 2025
In the midst of 2020 Covid measures, another change took place in Vermont: A law went into effect banning businesses from offering plastic bags to customers, with paper bags only available for a fee. A 2023 analysis of a survey of hundreds of Vermonters found the law appeared to have worked. Plastic bag use in…

A Roadmap

June 25, 2025
The Vermont Legislature adjourned Monday evening, June 16, following the passage of H.454, the education reform plan. I call it a roadmap as the legislation lays out a list of changes that will take place over the next few years. And as various studies and reports come back in, there will also likely be adjustments,…

Vermont to get over $21 million in nationwide settlement with Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers

June 25, 2025
Attorney General Charity Clark announced June 16 that all 55 attorneys general, representing all eligible states and U.S. territories, have agreed to sign on to a $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma and its owners, the Sackler family. This settlement was reached after the previous settlement was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. It resolves…