On March 19, 2025
State News

Vermont House votes to ban toxic ‘forever chemicals’ from more household products

The Vermont House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly Thursday, March 13, to outlaw the use of toxic perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in dental floss, cleaning products, and fluorine-treated containers — a critical step in reducing Vermonters’ exposure to these harmful substances.

According to the Vermont Dept. of Health, PFAS exposure can lead to reproductive and developmental disorders, decreased antibody response to vaccines, pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia, certain types of cancer, and more.

The bill (H.238), given initial approval by the House in a voice vote, builds on earlier legislation adopted in Vermont that addressed PFAS in personal care products, menstrual products, textiles, cookware, rugs and carpets, artificial turf, ski wax, and more.

“This law will be another important step toward protecting Vermonters and our environment from exposure to toxic PFAS,” said Anna Seuberling, environmental health advocate with the Vermont Public Interest Research Group (VPIRG).  “In fact, it’s hard to imagine a more direct path of exposure than using a string coated with PFAS to clean your teeth every day.”

In addition to adding more products to the list of those that must soon be free from intentionally added PFAS, the legislation strengthens the definition of what it means for the chemical to be “intentionally added.” The new definition will cover a broader use of PFAS in the manufacturing process, meaning that the standard will be more protective, even for products already covered by existing law.

“This legislation demonstrates that it is still possible to find broad agreement when it comes to protecting public health and our environment from dangerous chemicals like PFAS in consumer products,” said Rep. Amy Sheldon (D-Middlebury), chair of the House Environment Committee. “Toxic PFAS does not belong in products that we use in our homes every day. These are dangerous chemicals, and they are not necessary in things like dental floss, cleaning products, and the many other items we’ve already addressed in previous legislation. This is a win for public health and our environment,” Sheldon added. 

The legislation got final approval in the House last Friday and will be on the agenda in the Senate in the coming weeks.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Two members, including chair, resign from the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont

June 25, 2025
By Corey McDonald/VTDigger Two members of the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont, including the commission’s chair, announced last week they would be resigning, saying they no longer believed their efforts would make any impact. Meagan Roy, the chair of the commission, and Nicole Mace, the former representative of the Vermont School Boards…

Vt plastic bag use dropped 91% following ban, researchers find

June 25, 2025
In the midst of 2020 Covid measures, another change took place in Vermont: A law went into effect banning businesses from offering plastic bags to customers, with paper bags only available for a fee. A 2023 analysis of a survey of hundreds of Vermonters found the law appeared to have worked. Plastic bag use in…

A Roadmap

June 25, 2025
The Vermont Legislature adjourned Monday evening, June 16, following the passage of H.454, the education reform plan. I call it a roadmap as the legislation lays out a list of changes that will take place over the next few years. And as various studies and reports come back in, there will also likely be adjustments,…

Vermont to get over $21 million in nationwide settlement with Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers

June 25, 2025
Attorney General Charity Clark announced June 16 that all 55 attorneys general, representing all eligible states and U.S. territories, have agreed to sign on to a $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma and its owners, the Sackler family. This settlement was reached after the previous settlement was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. It resolves…