On June 19, 2024
Featured

Lawmakers override veto of annual property tax legislation

The legislation funds Vermont’s schools, increasing the average property tax bill by 13.8%

By Ethan Weinstein/VTDigger

The Vermont Legislature overrode Gov. Phil Scott’s veto of the annual property tax legislation that funds the state’s public school districts, solidifying an average projected property tax increase of 13.8%.

The vote passed 103-42 in the House, and 22-7 in the Senate. 

Earlier this month, Scott vetoed the so-called “yield bill,” telling lawmakers that the state needs “property tax relief now.”

This year’s historic increase in property taxes is driven by about a $180 million rise in school spending. Health care costs, student mental health needs, ailing infrastructure and rising inflation have all contributed to the surge.

Last week, officials from Scott’s administration met with legislative leaders to discuss the executive branch’s proposal for an alternative yield bill. That menu of ideas involved injecting $124 million of tax relief, ranging from using revenue surplus, nixing universal school meals, and drawing on the entirety of the state’s $47 million education fund reserve.

Lawmakers derided Scott’s proposal, characterizing it as fiscally irresponsible. 

The legislation already includes about $70 million of one-time funds to offset this year’s tax increase and levies ongoing new taxes on remotely-accessed software and short term rentals, projected to raise about $27 million next year. 

The bill also uses about $20 million to offset the rise in taxes for property owners who pay based on income, a group Democratic leaders have suggested will struggle the most to pay the increase.

“Not a single member of the Legislature would choose to raise property taxes if it could be avoided,” Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Baruth, D-Chittenden Central, said in a statement. “But our local districts have sent us the bill that reflects all of the rising costs they face — and pretending that bill doesn’t exist, or putting it on the credit card, won’t help any of us.”

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Okemo, ahead of the pack

January 8, 2025
By Karen D. Lorentz Editor’s note: This is Part 2 of a three-part series that explores how innovations at Okemo and Killington enabled them to become successful and popular ski resorts that also contributed to the growth of the ski industry in Vermont and the East. Okemo Ski Area, which debuted Jan. 31, 1956, was…

Marble Valley Fire: Safeguarding businesses with safety solutions

January 8, 2025
By James Kent As the new year begins, business owners must maintain their safety standards as they review goals for 2025. In Rutland and Windsor counties, Marble Valley Fire’s fire safety equipment and services positively impact these efforts. Marble Valley Fire’s owner Mike Roy’s commitment to fire safety is deeply rooted in his extensive background…

When is a cell tower a cell tower?

January 8, 2025
Hartland residents speak out about proposed 173-foot tower By Curt Peterson After the Hartland Select Board and planning commission each received notice that IT&W (Industrial Tower & Wireless) and/or Crown Coastal Inc. (a large NYSE listed corporation headquartered in Dallas) was proposing to erect a 173-foot tower with a 80-square-foot base on leased property next…

MVSU board approves district budget that keeps academic programs intact

January 8, 2025
By Polly Mikula After a narrow vote to save all unified arts (UA) programs and positions at the last school district board meeting, Dec. 16, the Mountain Views School District (MVSD) easily approved a revised budget Monday, Jan. 6, with a vote of 13-3. The approved budget reinstated all UA programs and positions and made…