On March 13, 2024

Vermonters rejected nearly one-third of school budgets

On Town Meeting Day 29 of 93 school budgets were voted down including four in Rutland County and two in Windsor County

By Ethan Weinstein/VTDigger

Voters struck down close to a third of school budgets across Vermont on Tuesday, March 5, the highest proportion in at least a decade, according to the Vermont Superintendents Association. 

Twenty-nine of 93 reported budgets were rejected, according to unofficial results collected by the association. Four districts still hadn’t reported as of early Wednesday afternoon, and 22 have votes still to come.

Last year, only two budgets were rejected on Town Meeting Day.

Leading up to Tuesday, voters had expressed dismay at the anticipated increase in education property taxes, projected to rise by an average of 19%, due in part to a proposed increase of more than $200 million in school spending.

In a joint statement, the Superintendents Association and the Vermont School Boards Association called for state and local collaboration in the face of a historic rejection of school budgets.

“Yesterday’s school district voting results indicate that, as a community, we have work to do in supporting our public education system and the taxpayers who fund it,” read the statement. “In an environment where societal needs are growing and the capacity of our public systems is diminishing, schools are expanding services to meet the needs of students and families. As a result, costs are mounting.”

School boards have until July 1 to rework budgets and pass them. If they’re unable to secure approval for a revised budget, districts can borrow up to 87% of their last passed budget to pay for operations.

The following districts or supervisory unions failed to pass budgets on Tuesday, according to the Superintendents Association:

  • Rutland County:
  • Barstow Unified Union
  • Otter Valley Unified Union
  • Rutland Town School District
  • Slate Valley Unified Union SD
  • Windsor County
  • Green Mountain Unified SD
  • Springfield School District 
  • Others statewide:
  • Addison Northwest School District
  • Alburgh School District
  • Barre Unified Union School District
  • Champlain Islands Unified Union SD
  • Champlain Valley School District
  • Elmore/Morristown Unified Union School District
  • Enosburg-Richford School District 
  • Fairfax School District
  • Harwood Unified Union
  • Holland School District
  • Kingdom East School District
  • Lamoille North Modified Unified Union School District, elementary
  • Milton School District
  • Montpelier-Roxbury School District
  • Mount Abraham Unified SD
  • Northern Mountain Valley Unified Union School District
  • Paine Mountain School District
  • South Burlington School District
  • South Hero School District
  • St. Johnsbury School District

Schools this Town Meeting Day grappled with the latest changes to Vermont’s education funding formula, which affected how much money towns could spend at a given tax rate, and became a target of school spending frustration.

Amid concerns about dramatic property tax hikes and questions about the impact of the state’s revamped education financing formula, lawmakers passed, and Gov. Phil Scott signed, 11th-hour legislation last month allowing districts to postpone their budget votes to next month. 

Don Tinney, president of the Vermont-National Education Association, a teachers’ union, said in a statement that a “once-in-a-generation confluence of events” had fueled this year’s projected property tax increases. 

“I know that last night’s rejection of nearly a third of all school budgets isn’t a repudiation of our local public schools and the tens of thousands of Vermont students they serve every day,” Tinney said. “Rather, it’s a reasonable reaction to completely unrealistic spikes in property taxes driven by events over which our dedicated local school boards have no control.”

Now, as school boards must redraft budgets, the average estimated education property increase for Vermonters will almost certainly fall, though the exact extent will remain unknown until all budgets pass and the Legislature works through other Education Fund considerations.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Two members, including chair, resign from the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont

June 25, 2025
By Corey McDonald/VTDigger Two members of the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont, including the commission’s chair, announced last week they would be resigning, saying they no longer believed their efforts would make any impact. Meagan Roy, the chair of the commission, and Nicole Mace, the former representative of the Vermont School Boards…

Vt plastic bag use dropped 91% following ban, researchers find

June 25, 2025
In the midst of 2020 Covid measures, another change took place in Vermont: A law went into effect banning businesses from offering plastic bags to customers, with paper bags only available for a fee. A 2023 analysis of a survey of hundreds of Vermonters found the law appeared to have worked. Plastic bag use in…

Plan to manage 72,000 acres of the Telephone Gap project is finalized

June 25, 2025
Staff report The U.S. Forest Service issued its final plan for managing 72,000 acres of public and private land on June 16. The proposed Telephone Gap Integrated Resource Project area is located on the Green Mountain National Forest (GMNF) within the towns of Brandon, Chittenden, Goshen, Killington, Mendon, Pittsfield, Pittsford, and Stockbridge. “The Telephone Gap project is…

Killington residents push for skate park as town reimagines recreation future 

June 25, 2025
By Greta Solsaa/VTDigger As Killington celebrates the 50th anniversary of its recreation center, some residents are pushing to make a skate park a new permanent fixture of the town’s summer offerings.  The town crafted its recreation master plan to holistically determine how to best use its resources to serve residents in the future, Recreation Department Director Emily Hudson…