On March 13, 2024

Vermonters rejected nearly one-third of school budgets

On Town Meeting Day 29 of 93 school budgets were voted down including four in Rutland County and two in Windsor County

By Ethan Weinstein/VTDigger

Voters struck down close to a third of school budgets across Vermont on Tuesday, March 5, the highest proportion in at least a decade, according to the Vermont Superintendents Association. 

Twenty-nine of 93 reported budgets were rejected, according to unofficial results collected by the association. Four districts still hadn’t reported as of early Wednesday afternoon, and 22 have votes still to come.

Last year, only two budgets were rejected on Town Meeting Day.

Leading up to Tuesday, voters had expressed dismay at the anticipated increase in education property taxes, projected to rise by an average of 19%, due in part to a proposed increase of more than $200 million in school spending.

In a joint statement, the Superintendents Association and the Vermont School Boards Association called for state and local collaboration in the face of a historic rejection of school budgets.

“Yesterday’s school district voting results indicate that, as a community, we have work to do in supporting our public education system and the taxpayers who fund it,” read the statement. “In an environment where societal needs are growing and the capacity of our public systems is diminishing, schools are expanding services to meet the needs of students and families. As a result, costs are mounting.”

School boards have until July 1 to rework budgets and pass them. If they’re unable to secure approval for a revised budget, districts can borrow up to 87% of their last passed budget to pay for operations.

The following districts or supervisory unions failed to pass budgets on Tuesday, according to the Superintendents Association:

  • Rutland County:
  • Barstow Unified Union
  • Otter Valley Unified Union
  • Rutland Town School District
  • Slate Valley Unified Union SD
  • Windsor County
  • Green Mountain Unified SD
  • Springfield School District 
  • Others statewide:
  • Addison Northwest School District
  • Alburgh School District
  • Barre Unified Union School District
  • Champlain Islands Unified Union SD
  • Champlain Valley School District
  • Elmore/Morristown Unified Union School District
  • Enosburg-Richford School District 
  • Fairfax School District
  • Harwood Unified Union
  • Holland School District
  • Kingdom East School District
  • Lamoille North Modified Unified Union School District, elementary
  • Milton School District
  • Montpelier-Roxbury School District
  • Mount Abraham Unified SD
  • Northern Mountain Valley Unified Union School District
  • Paine Mountain School District
  • South Burlington School District
  • South Hero School District
  • St. Johnsbury School District

Schools this Town Meeting Day grappled with the latest changes to Vermont’s education funding formula, which affected how much money towns could spend at a given tax rate, and became a target of school spending frustration.

Amid concerns about dramatic property tax hikes and questions about the impact of the state’s revamped education financing formula, lawmakers passed, and Gov. Phil Scott signed, 11th-hour legislation last month allowing districts to postpone their budget votes to next month. 

Don Tinney, president of the Vermont-National Education Association, a teachers’ union, said in a statement that a “once-in-a-generation confluence of events” had fueled this year’s projected property tax increases. 

“I know that last night’s rejection of nearly a third of all school budgets isn’t a repudiation of our local public schools and the tens of thousands of Vermont students they serve every day,” Tinney said. “Rather, it’s a reasonable reaction to completely unrealistic spikes in property taxes driven by events over which our dedicated local school boards have no control.”

Now, as school boards must redraft budgets, the average estimated education property increase for Vermonters will almost certainly fall, though the exact extent will remain unknown until all budgets pass and the Legislature works through other Education Fund considerations.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Okemo Valley Holiday Express brings festive cheer to Vermont

December 18, 2024
Dec. 21 through 22 from 9 a.m to 6 p.m.—CHESTER—The Okemo Valley Regional Chamber of Commerce (OVRCC), in collaboration with Vermont Rail System, is launching the Okemo Valley Holiday Express, a new festive holiday train experience for families and visitors. Running on Dec 21 and 22, the excursion train offers a scenic journey through South-Central…

John Rodgers seeks to be a bridge between parties in his new role as Lt. Gov.

December 18, 2024
By Ekaterina Raikhovski Editor’s note: The following story was supplied by Community News Service, a University of Vermont journalism internship, originally produced for an assignment for the Winooski News. Grandchildren running around his 1840s farmhouse isn’t the only thing keeping John Rodgers’ hands full these days. There’s the masonry business the West Glover 59-year-old has…

Education funding: The three cliffs problem

December 18, 2024
Education spending saw its biggest jump in years in fiscal 2025, and school taxpayers are noticing the change in their bills. The increase this year was due to a lot of factors outside both schools’ and taxpayers’ control—inflation, healthcare costs, and the loss of pandemic-era federal support chief among them. All of that led to…

Vermont loosened Act 250 rules for housing, how are developers responding?

December 18, 2024
By Carly Berlin Editor’s note: This story, by Report for America corps member Carly Berlin, was produced through a partnership between VTDigger and Vermont Public. When 10 apartments at the new Armory House building just outside of downtown Vergennes opened in June, they all had tenants within two weeks. To Peter Kahn, the building’s developer, watching…