On March 6, 2024

Vermonters rejected nearly one-third of school budgets

On Town Meeting Day 29 of 93 reported budgets were voted down

By Ethan Weinstein/VTDigger

Voters struck down close to a third of school budgets across Vermont on Tuesday, March 5, the highest proportion in at least a decade, according to the Vermont Superintendents Association. 

Twenty-nine of 93 reported budgets were rejected, according to unofficial results collected by the association. Four districts still hadn’t reported as of early Wednesday afternoon, and 22 have votes still to come.

Last year, only two budgets were rejected on Town Meeting Day.

Leading up to Tuesday, voters had expressed dismay at the anticipated increase in education property taxes, projected to rise by an average of 19%, due in part to a proposed increase of more than $200 million in school spending.

In a joint statement, the superintendents association and the Vermont School Boards Association called for state and local collaboration in the face of a historic rejection of school budgets.

“Yesterday’s school district voting results indicate that, as a community, we have work to do in supporting our public education system and the taxpayers who fund it,” read the statement. “In an environment where societal needs are growing and the capacity of our public systems is diminishing, schools are expanding services to meet the needs of students and families. As a result, costs are mounting.”

School boards have until July 1 to rework budgets and pass them. If they’re unable to secure approval for a revised budget, districts can borrow up to 87% of their last passed budget to pay for operations.

The following districts or supervisory unions failed to pass budgets on Tuesday, according to the superintendents association:

• Addison Northwest School District
• Alburgh School District
• Barre Unified Union School District
• Barstow Unified Union
• Champlain Islands Unified Union School District
• Champlain Valley School District
• Elmore/Morristown Unified Union School District
• Enosburg-Richford School District 
• Fairfax School District
• Green Mountain Unified School District
• Harwood Unified Union
• Holland School District
• Kingdom East School District
• Lamoille North Modified Unified Union School District, elementary budget
• Milton School District
• Montpelier-Roxbury School District
• Mount Abraham Unified School District
• Northern Mountain Valley Unified Union School District
• Otter Valley Unified Union
• Paine Mountain School District
• Rutland Town School District
• Slate Valley Unified Union School District
• South Burlington School District
• South Hero School District
• Springfield School District 
• St. Johnsbury School District

 

Schools this Town Meeting Day grappled with the latest changes to Vermont’s education funding formula, which affected how much money towns could spend at a given tax rate, and became a target of school spending frustration.

Amid concerns about dramatic property tax hikes and questions about the impact of the state’s revamped education financing formula, lawmakers passed, and Gov. Phil Scott signed, eleventh-hour legislation last month allowing districts to postpone their budget votes to next month. 

Don Tinney, president of the Vermont-National Education Association, a teachers union, said in a statement that a “once-in-a-generation confluence of events” had fueled this year’s projected property tax increases. 

“I know that last night’s rejection of nearly a third of all school budgets isn’t a repudiation of our local public schools and the tens of thousands of Vermont students they serve every day,” Tinney said. “Rather, it’s a reasonable reaction to completely unrealistic spikes in property taxes driven by events over which our dedicated local school boards have no control.”

Now, as school boards must redraft budgets, the average estimated education property increase for Vermonters will almost certainly fall, though the exact extent will remain unknown until all budgets pass and the Legislature works through other Education Fund considerations.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

The VSO Jukebox series brings intimacy and accessibility to classical music

November 13, 2024
By James Kent There is such an excitement and enthusiasm to Matt LaRocca’s voice that after speaking with him for a few minutes, one can’t escape the feeling that they know him, have been friends for years, and can’t wait to hang out and talk again. LaRocca curates The Vermont Symphony Orchestra’s (VSO) Jukebox series,…

VTrans announces new plow names and winner of long-wing contest

November 13, 2024
The Vermont Agency of Transportation (AOT) received 118 new names for its big orange plow trucks through this year’s Name a Plow program for Vermont schools. The agency also received 77 entries in the contest for schools to name the new plow truck that has a second plow spanning 21 feet and will be used…

Killington Resort’s Mike Solimano honored with the Sen. Leahy Trailblazer Award

November 13, 2024
The Vermont Outdoor Business Alliance (VOBA) announced Tuesday, Nov. 12, that the fourth annual U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy Trailblazer Award has been awarded to Mike Solimano, president and CEO of Killington Resort & Pico Mountain. The award, first given to and named for Sen. Patrick Leahy, honors an individual’s lifetime of service in Vermont’s outdoor…

Downtown Rutland is poised for major change

November 13, 2024
News of Walmart’s exit coupled by planned developments, including a downtown hotel and theatre expansion, has sparked talk of opportunity By Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger Thirty years ago, in the fall of 1994, Rutland City leaders eagerly awaited news of final plans for the cornerstone of their long-germinating downtown revitalization efforts: A new $20 million corporate headquarters…