On May 4, 2022

Senators admit clean heat standard is a carbon tax

By Rob Roper

Editor’s note: Rob Roper is on the board of directors of the Ethan Allen Institute.

On the morning of April 15, after weeks of discussion and just hours before they voted 4-1 to advance legislation that would saddle Vermonters with a radical, economy transforming “clean heat standard” for home heating fuels, senators on the Natural Resources & Energy Committee asked a remarkable question: “What do you get to do with a [clean heat] credit when you buy them?”

They did not know. They could not really explain.

This is pretty shocking considering the whole proposal for a clean heat standard is based on the concept creating an obligation for fossil fuel dealers to buy clean heat credits in order to sell fossil-based heating fuels to their customers. It’s kind of an important detail to clearly understand before making an informed decision about whether or not the bill is a good idea.

Sen. Mark MacDonald (D-Orange) kicked off a roughly 30-minute discussion trying to get to the bottom of exactly what the committee was voting on with the somewhat bizarre statement, “Before I kill someone to get their clean heat credits, I want to know what the charge is going to be. Embezzlement, scam, securities fraud?”

Committee chair Chris Bray (D-Addison) tried — and failed — to explain how the credit system might work, leaving MacDonald even more confused, “Where does the money come from? I don’t understand it so I can’t explain it. I don’t understand anything.”

Bray tried again, pointing out that sellers of fossil heating fuels would be obligated to purchase “clean heat credits” in order to sell their products, and that the cost of these credits would likely be passed along to consumers.

“No one knows this for sure, because they [the Public Utilities Commission (PUC)] haven’t worked out the system,” he said. These senators are about to sign off on and give force of law to a “plan” that doesn’t yet exist, and therefore can’t be understood.

As MacDonald summed up, “They [the PUC] in theory understand what we are not able to explain. We are asking them to design the thing that will work. But we can’t explain what we are asking them to design.”

One critical point did register with MacDonald, however. “So, when John McClaughry says we’ve got a fuel tax coming — a carbon tax — I think John is correct. That’s what we’re doing. Isn’t that what we’re doing?”

Bray agreed. “That’s right. In essence you’re building into the price of the fuel the cost to help reduce the emissions.”

MacDonald laid out the gist, “By paying this thing to pollute — to burn this fossil fuel which is doing our atmosphere and our future damage, you’re going to pay extra. And that extra money is going to be used to hire people who are interested in reducing the amount they use.”

Bray again agreed, “That’s a yes.” He also noted, “We don’t know what the cost impacts will be.”

So, let this sink in. Our legislators are voting to make a law that will radically transform not just our economy but our entire way of life, not really knowing what it is they’re voting for. They don’t know how it works, they don’t know what it will do, they don’t know what it will cost, they can’t explain it to their colleagues or their constituents. But four out of five of them voted for it anyway.

Gov. Scott is demanding the clean heat standard bill contain a “check back” provision wherein after the PUC does design the plan and legislators do have enough information to understand how it will work and what it will cost, legislators would then have to affirmatively vote to put the clean heat standard into law. This is just common sense. But common sense is lacking. They rejected the idea of a “check back.”

This is why Vermont is a hot mess of unaffordability and regulatory quagmires. The people we’ve elected to run the state do not know what they are doing, admit that they do not know what they are doing, do it anyway, and don’t care what it costs or how it disrupts the lives of the people they ostensibly serve.

If as a result of this entirely negligent approach you can’t afford to heat your home, Sen. MacDonald has advice for you: “Get a blanket for Christ’s sake!”

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

1,700 pounds of Cabot butter recalled in Vermont and 6 other states for possible fecal contamination

April 16, 2025
By Habib Sabet/VtDigger Cabot Creamery has issued a voluntary recall for nearly a ton of butter due to potential fecal contamination, the brand’s parent company, Agri-Mark Inc., announced April 9. The recall covers 189 cases of the iconic Vermont brand’s 8-oz. Extra Creamy Premium Butter across Vermont, New York, Pennsylvania, Maine, Connecticut, New Hampshire and…

Moving Day

April 16, 2025
“Moving Day” in the world of golf often refers to Saturday’s third round play at the annual Masters Golf Tournament at Augusta Country Club. This is when top players often move into contention for Sunday’s final round for the championship, just like Rory McIlroy did this past Saturday with an impressive six under par performance.…

IMLS terminates grant for Vermont Historical Society’s local history program

April 16, 2025
The Vermont Historical Society (VHS) announced that the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) terminated its federal funding for the Activating 21st Century Local History Training Program, effective April 8. The decision follows President Donald Trump’s recent executive order to defund several federal agencies, including IMLS. In a letter from acting IMLS director Keith…

Palestinian man legally living in White River Junction was detained during citizenship interview in Vermont

April 16, 2025
By Auditi Guha/VTDigger Masked men in plainclothes detained an Upper Valley resident in Colchester during a scheduled citizenship interview Monday morning, April 14, despite his status as a lawful U.S. permanent resident. Mohsen Mahdawi’s lawyers filed a petition Monday alleging unlawful detention in the U.S. District Court in Vermont. Judge William Sessions III then issued a temporary restraining order saying…