On March 30, 2022

Senate unanimously approves new district maps with little debate

By Sarah Mearhoff/VTDigger

With hardly any debate, the Vermont Senate in a series of votes Friday, March 25, unanimously approved the House and Senate’s newly drawn legislative district lines. If approved and signed into law, the maps would stand for the next 10 years.

Courtesy VT Office of Legislative Counsel
Map shows new Senate districts. Rutland County’s geographical boundary expanded slightly to meet the target threshold of 21,400 residents per senator. Windsor County remained the same.

In the upper chamber, senators debated how to fairly divide representation among just 30 senators across a state that saw dramatic population shifts in the past decade. Vermont’s population hub, Chittenden County, saw an influx of constituents, while the population declined in the Northeast Kingdom and portions of southern Vermont.

As a result, the state’s most rural region lost a senator to Chittenden County. The Northeast Kingdom, which includes Essex, Caledonia and Orleans counties, was previously represented by four senators. Under the new map, three would hail from the region.

Seven senators would now represent Chittenden County. The new map would also break up Chittenden County’s current and unusual six-member district as a result of a 2019 law prohibiting Senate districts with more than three members.

The proposed configuration in central and southern Vermont remained largely untouched, though Rutland County’s district swelled geographically to compensate for population loss.

Sen. Jeanette White, D-Windham, who chaired the Senate Reapportionment Committee, said during a joint caucus ahead of the vote that her committee considered roughly 30 different map options from beginning to end. She said both Republicans and Democrats have aired grievances about the final product, “so we must have done our job.” The final product distributes Vermont’s 30 senators across 16 districts. Each senator should represent as close to 21,400 constituents as possible.

House seats

The debate around the House’s apportionment of its 150 members was driven by the existential question of whether to maintain Vermont’s unique multimember district model or to adopt a full single-member district map. Despite complaints from opponents, who contend that multimember districts are fundamentally unfair, representatives kept the multimember model.

Courtesy VT Office of Legislative Counsel
Map shows new House districts. Nearly all districts in Rutland and Windsor county were reconfigured to some extent to hit the target of 4,287 residents per representative.

The House’s map divides representation among 150 representatives, who are to represent as close to 4,287 constituents as possible. The final map includes 68 single-member districts and 41 two-member districts.

The process was colored by the Legislature’s expedited timeline. Officials could not begin map-drawing until they had the 2020 census results, which were published late by the federal government due to the pandemic. Secretary of State Jim Condos gave state lawmakers an April 1 deadline to get the job done.

In an initial roll call vote Friday, senators voted 29-0 in favor of H.722, which includes the House and Senate maps. Senators cast a second, final vote, sending the bill back to the House, where representatives have yet to greenlight the Senate map. Then it would head to Gov. Phil Scott and Condos.

In an emailed statement, Scott spokesperson Jason Maulucci said that “there are always winners and losers” every reapportionment cycle, but Scott is particularly concerned about the trend of rural Vermonters losing representation in Montpelier.

“We see the consequences of the our (sic) demographic challenges in numerous ways, and the further redistribution of representation from rural areas to more economically well-off parts of the state are another example,” Maulucci said.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Two members, including chair, resign from the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont

June 25, 2025
By Corey McDonald/VTDigger Two members of the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont, including the commission’s chair, announced last week they would be resigning, saying they no longer believed their efforts would make any impact. Meagan Roy, the chair of the commission, and Nicole Mace, the former representative of the Vermont School Boards…

Vt plastic bag use dropped 91% following ban, researchers find

June 25, 2025
In the midst of 2020 Covid measures, another change took place in Vermont: A law went into effect banning businesses from offering plastic bags to customers, with paper bags only available for a fee. A 2023 analysis of a survey of hundreds of Vermonters found the law appeared to have worked. Plastic bag use in…

A Roadmap

June 25, 2025
The Vermont Legislature adjourned Monday evening, June 16, following the passage of H.454, the education reform plan. I call it a roadmap as the legislation lays out a list of changes that will take place over the next few years. And as various studies and reports come back in, there will also likely be adjustments,…

Vermont to get over $21 million in nationwide settlement with Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers

June 25, 2025
Attorney General Charity Clark announced June 16 that all 55 attorneys general, representing all eligible states and U.S. territories, have agreed to sign on to a $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma and its owners, the Sackler family. This settlement was reached after the previous settlement was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. It resolves…