On February 25, 2022

Educators, school administrators divided over bill that would let teachers look for other jobs while under contract

By Peter D’Auria/VTDigger

Under Vermont law, once teachers sign a contract to teach for the upcoming school year, they must honor it.

Unless they have “just cause” to leave the job, a teacher who breaks a contract will be barred from teaching in a public school for the rest of the academic year.

Now, a new bill before the Vermont legislature aims to change that. S.162, which was introduced last month, would give teachers a roughly two-month window to search for and accept new jobs — even while under contract to teach elsewhere.

“The (Senate Education) Committee is talking about, ‘How can we make Vermont the best place to be a teacher?’” said Sen. Andrew Perchlik D/P-Washington, the bill’s sponsor. Part of the solution, he said, could involve, “(respecting) teachers’ ability to get the job that matters most for them and their family.”

But the proposal has divided Vermont’s education sector, with teachers in favor and school administrators strongly opposed.

The state chapter of the National Education Association, the teachers union, argues that the bill simply gives teachers a right that many other workers take for granted: the ability to look for a new job, even after agreeing to work elsewhere.

“No other professional in the public or private sector is required to get permission from a boss to interview for a new position,” said Jeff Fannon, the executive director of the Vermont teachers union, told the Vermont Senate Committee on Education.

Vermont school administrators issue contracts to teachers after voters approve districts’ budgets, which usually takes place on Town Meeting Day. Contracts must be sent out no later than April 15.

After that, teachers usually have two weeks to sign them, though some can get extensions. Contracts generally begin on July 1.

If the bill passes, teachers would have until June 15 to search for, interview at and accept jobs in other districts, even if they have signed a contract to teach elsewhere. That window, Fannon said, would give teachers a “modest and reasonable amount of flexibility” to search for and accept jobs that are closer to home or offer better pay.

But if teachers are allowed to accept other jobs after signing a contract, school administrators say, it could leave districts scrambling to fill positions before the beginning of the school year.

“A contract is a contract is a contract,” Mark Tucker, the superintendent of Caledonia Central Supervisory Union, told the Senate Committee on Education last week. “The idea that someone can sign a contract, and then actively seek to break that contract, defies common sense and is an affront to common practice.”

Principals and superintendents also fear the bill could exacerbate staffing shortages in rural and lower-income school districts, as teachers leave last-minute to go to districts with better salaries.

“It’s a real scary bill for principals and superintendents, whose primary responsibility (is) to make sure there’s teachers in front of their kids,” Jay Nichols, the executive director of the Vermont Principals’ Association, said in an interview. “And in the places where there’s more poverty, or relative poverty compared to the districts around you, it’s a huge disadvantage.”

Perchlik, the sponsor of the bill, said he was open to compromise.

“I’m trying to be fair to the school, and fair and respectful of the teachers as a profession,” he said.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Vt Legislature advances bill to ban toxic ‘forever chemicals’ from firefighting gear, dental floss, cleaning products

June 4, 2025
The Vermont Senate and House advance legislation (H.238) May 29 that would outlaw the use of toxic perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in firefighting gear, dental floss, cleaning products, and fluorine-treated containers—a critical step in reducing Vermonters’ exposure to these harmful substances. The Senate expanded the bill as passed by the House by adding a provision that…

To be continued…

June 4, 2025
A final compromise on education reform proved elusive late Friday, and at about 11 p.m., the Senate adjourned, followed by the House at about 11:30 p.m. As late as 10 p.m., legislative leaders were still hopeful that the six conferees (three House and three Senate members) could reach a deal sometime before midnight that would…

Nearing the end?

June 4, 2025
After passing several challenging bills in the last few weeks, the Vermont Legislature adjourned until June 16 due to an impasse over negotiations on our education transformation bill, H.454. Many other bills addressing housing, homelessness, healthcare, and several other major issues required compromises from both the House and the Senate in order to be passed…

Vermont gets $23 million from ongoing settlement with tobacco manufacturers

June 4, 2025
Attorney General Charity Clark announced last month that Vermont received a total of $23,132,483.92 from tobacco manufacturers under the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). Annually, Vermont receives monies from tobacco manufacturers from the MSA, which resolved the state’s lawsuit filed in the 1990s. The settlement funds are credited to the state’s Tobacco Fund, and the…