On January 12, 2022

Scott announces plan to send 500,000 free rapid tests to Vermonters

By Lola Duffort/VTDigger

The state is partnering with the National Institutes of Health to send 500,000 free Covid-19 rapid antigen tests to Vermonters’ homes in the coming weeks, Gov. Phil Scott announced Thursday, Jan. 6. On Jan. 11, the announced a site would be up on Jan. 12 where families could register to receive two kits (4 tests) per household.

The White House announced in late December that it would begin sending 500 million free rapid tests to Americans who request them sometime in January, although the program has not yet rolled out. The governor’s office said the state’s initiative would be in addition to the federal effort, and would not replace existing rapid testing programs already in place in Vermont’s schools and child care facilities.

“Rapid tests are an important tool, but Americans need to be able to get them easily, quickly and far more affordably. While we wait for more details on President Biden’s rapid testing initiative, we are considering ways to simplify and expand our state’s testing system,” Scott said in a statement.

The QuickVue tests, manufactured by Quidel, will come in packs of two, according to the governor’s office. Vermonters will be able to order them online and need to provide their names and mailing addresses. Additional details about how to order will be released next week.

Other states, including Missouri, New Hampshire and New Jersey have also attempted to deploy large numbers of free Covid-19 tests by shipping them directly to residents who ask for them. Basically, all have run into the same problem: extraordinarily high demand, and far too little supply.

The announcement from the governor’s office sought to manage expectations, and stressed that the initiative should be considered a pilot project. The state is gauging “how well the system works so we can continue to improve testing options and work with President Biden’s team to make future testing programs successful,” the governor said.

“As with every new program, there are going to be unanticipated challenges, the number of kits each household can order will be limited, it could take up to a week for them to be delivered, and we expect that they will go very, very quickly,” Scott added.

Also mirroring a federal initiative, Scott announced last month that the state would use its emergency rulemaking powers to require private health insurers to reimburse the cost of rapid tests purchased at pharmacies. Vermonters can file claims with their insurance company for tests they bought anytime after Dec. 1.

Antigen tests are slightly less accurate than PCR tests, which are still considered the gold standard for diagnosing Covid-19, and emerging research suggests the antigen tests may be even less sensitive to the Omicron variant. But experts say the at-home tests are still an enormously powerful public health tool for interrupting transmission, given their convenience and quick turnaround. While lab-processed PCR results can take days to come back, antigen tests deliver results within 15 minutes.

Timothy Lahey, an infectious disease physician and director of clinical ethics at the University of Vermont Medical Center, welcomed the governor’s announcement as a “great development.”

“While Omicron might make the tests a wee bit less sensitive (maybe), they do still work well and are that much more important each day the state breaks records for case counts,” he wrote in an email to VTDigger.

Still, Lahey said it’s important that the tests be used correctly. If someone is planning to gather unmasked with others, a negative test can provide reassurance they are unlikely to be infectious for the next few hours. But anyone with symptoms who receives a positive result should assume they have a confirmed diagnosis. And close contacts should test five and seven days after their exposure, since tests taken too early can miss infections.

“Dramatically expanding access to rapid tests is a very good idea.” said Elizabeth Winterbauer, a consulting epidemiologist and part-time public health instructor at St. Michael’s College and the University of Vermont. But she also stressed that people should test multiple times after exposure — and argued that still more was needed to combat Vermont’s latest Covid surge.

“Increased testing alone is not going to reduce Covid’s explosive growth in the state,” she said. “Right now we must do everything we can to reduce transmission, with layered mitigation measures.”

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Two members, including chair, resign from the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont

June 25, 2025
By Corey McDonald/VTDigger Two members of the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont, including the commission’s chair, announced last week they would be resigning, saying they no longer believed their efforts would make any impact. Meagan Roy, the chair of the commission, and Nicole Mace, the former representative of the Vermont School Boards…

Vt plastic bag use dropped 91% following ban, researchers find

June 25, 2025
In the midst of 2020 Covid measures, another change took place in Vermont: A law went into effect banning businesses from offering plastic bags to customers, with paper bags only available for a fee. A 2023 analysis of a survey of hundreds of Vermonters found the law appeared to have worked. Plastic bag use in…

A Roadmap

June 25, 2025
The Vermont Legislature adjourned Monday evening, June 16, following the passage of H.454, the education reform plan. I call it a roadmap as the legislation lays out a list of changes that will take place over the next few years. And as various studies and reports come back in, there will also likely be adjustments,…

Vermont to get over $21 million in nationwide settlement with Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers

June 25, 2025
Attorney General Charity Clark announced June 16 that all 55 attorneys general, representing all eligible states and U.S. territories, have agreed to sign on to a $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma and its owners, the Sackler family. This settlement was reached after the previous settlement was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. It resolves…