On October 13, 2021

‘Vermont Proposition’ action team aims to improve the state’s future

By Kevin O’Connor / VT Digger

Creating an affordable statewide high-speed broadband and cellular access plan would appear to be a feat of a lifetime.

So, what if one also wanted to reduce poverty, racism and climate change, improve Vermont’s economy, environment and education system, and strengthen its public trust, civility and democratic decision-making?

“We are no longer at a point where we can tackle our pressing issues in isolation,” said Charlie Hancock, chair of a new Vermont Proposition action team that’s aiming to collectively address the state’s biggest challenges.

The volunteer group of 24 diverse leaders has come together with the help of the nonpartisan nonprofit Vermont Council on Rural Development, which has led three decades of policy efforts on agricultural development, energy generation, the creative and digital economies, and democratic engagement.

“The Vermont Proposition is a starting point to promote action over the next three years that will be essential for a strong and prosperous future over the next 30,” said Paul Costello, the council’s outgoing executive director.

The council was contemplating a major study about the state’s future upon the arrival of Covid-19, only to see the need expand in the year and a half since.

“We are together at a historic threshold where there are major opportunities to think bigger,” Costello said. “Working collectively, we have this tremendous power for change.”

Organizers, tapping hundreds of personal interviews and more than 1,000 written contributions, have crafted a 27-page report that calls for the state to:

  1. Ensure affordable high-speed broadband and cellular access for all to promote community connection and commerce.
  2. Combat racism and celebrate diversity.
  3. Advance creative solutions to climate change.
  4. Reduce poverty and promote opportunities for prosperity for all.
  5. Give all children access to affordable, high-quality care and education.
  6. Ensure students of all backgrounds and abilities thrive in public schools for future civic and vocational success.
  7. Strengthen local business and entrepreneurship through investment and innovation.
  8. Boost state planning and regional coordination to promote efficiency and foresight.
  9. Conserve land and water while cultivating a working landscape.
  10. Renew civic engagement and strengthen trust, civility and democratic decision-making.

To spur this, the council has gathered a Future of Vermont action team featuring two dozen leaders from business, government, education, farming and forestry, health care and the nonprofit sector.

“Action team members bring expertise in one or more areas, but all have committed to pushing for progress on the Proposition as a whole,” said Hancock, a consulting forester and chair of the Montgomery Select Board.

It’s not the first time Vermonters have attempted such an effort.

The Vermont Commission on Country Life, formed after the disastrous flood of 1927, funneled similar discussions into a report that called for creation of the state police and enlargement of the state Board of Education.

In 1968, the state’s first modern Democratic governor, Philip Hoff, chaired the Vermont Planning Council, whose “Vision and Choice — Vermont’s Future” study helped spur the pioneering Act 250 land-use law.

In 1988, the state’s first female governor, Madeleine Kunin, created the Governor’s Commission on Vermont’s Future that sparked the Act 200 growth management law.

The Council on Rural Development first took its own turn from 2007 to 2009, when it surveyed almost 4,000 experts and everyday folk for its report “Imagining Vermont: Values and Vision for the Future.” That inspired a working lands enterprise initiative that has granted more than $7 million to farm and forestry projects.

The new action team plans to develop a schedule and strategies to propel its plan by strengthening existing efforts and seeding new ones. It is also gathering a coalition of supportive individuals and organizations as part of a Partnership for the Future of Vermont.

“This is an opportunity to bring Vermonters together at a time when we are surrounded by the undercurrents of divisiveness,” Costello said.

“We need to stand up together,” incoming executive director Brian Lowe added, “and address these problems collaboratively.”

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Vermont’s ski areas boast growth with 4.16 million skier visits for 2024-25

June 11, 2025
Vermont’s Alpine and cross-country ski areas joined industry partners, supporters, and friends at Ski Vermont’s 56th annual meeting at Sugarbush Resort, June 4-5, recapping a season of continued growth despite challenges. Vermont’s Alpine ski areas reported 4.16 million skier visits for the 2024–25 season, an increase of 1.1% over the previous year and 6.2% over…

White River Valley SU withdraws from the Vermont School Boards Association 

June 11, 2025
By Corey McDonald/VTDigger The White River Valley Supervisory Union last week moved to withdraw its membership from the Vermont School Boards Association, highlighting deep divisions among the state’s school districts and supervisory unions over the trajectory of education reform. The White River Valley board’s decision marks an overt break in unity with a prominent advocacy organization…

Vt Legislature advances bill to ban toxic ‘forever chemicals’ from firefighting gear, dental floss, cleaning products

June 4, 2025
The Vermont Senate and House advance legislation (H.238) May 29 that would outlaw the use of toxic perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in firefighting gear, dental floss, cleaning products, and fluorine-treated containers—a critical step in reducing Vermonters’ exposure to these harmful substances. The Senate expanded the bill as passed by the House by adding a provision that…

To be continued…

June 4, 2025
A final compromise on education reform proved elusive late Friday, and at about 11 p.m., the Senate adjourned, followed by the House at about 11:30 p.m. As late as 10 p.m., legislative leaders were still hopeful that the six conferees (three House and three Senate members) could reach a deal sometime before midnight that would…