On September 1, 2021

When is a meeting not a meeting?

By Curt Peterson

The Killington Select Board met as planned on Aug. 24, but the get-together was quickly converted to a “non-meeting” in the words of Select Board member Jim Haff. 

Haff, as a Killington representative on the Windsor Central Unified Union School District board, had attended a 2½-hour open meetings law training session on Aug. 16, education that was required following a complaint by a parent of two students in the district. The Aug. 24 meeting, Haff explained, was not warned according to the letter of the open meetings law, and, therefore, the board could not hold an actual meeting.

“We can’t vote on anything, or make any decisions tonight,” he said. “We can only discuss the issues.”

“Can we approve the agenda?” Select Board chair Steve Finneron asked.

“No,” Haff said. “And we can’t approve the minutes of the last meeting either.”

And so the evening proceeded with no action taken on liquor control licensing issues nor approval of town or golf course financial reports. A proposed procurement policy, required for the planning commission to move forward on the town improvement funding, had to be tabled, Haff said.

“We went over the financial for July, that’s all we did,” Haff added. That  type of work falls under the exception to open meeting laws, under clerical work category. 

“But this is important — we need to warn a special meeting as soon as possible to get that procurement policy approved, and the TIF process started,” he said.

Town Manager Chet Hagenbarth promised to properly warn a special meeting for Thursday, Aug. 26 at 3 p.m. so the business left hanging at the end of the non-meeting could be taken care of. 

There was no official meeting, so adjournment was also prohibited. The Select Board members said “Good night” and the Zoom screen went blank.

Was it a quorum? All three Select Board members were present, and they were discussing clerical work (July town financials), albeit not voting or taking action. 

There is no definition provided for a “non-meeting.” Haff assured the Mountain Times that every part of the discussion during the “non-meeting” was repeated for the public at the properly-warned Thursday redux.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Downtown Rutland hotel project moves forward as mayoral election looms

February 20, 2025
By James Kent At a press event Thursday morning, Feb. 20, Mayor Doenges and developers from Center & Wales LLC signed a letter of intent, marking a formal commitment to move forward with the $40 million investment that will reshape the corner of Center and Wales streets. The project will bring a seven-story, mixed-use building…

Candidates for Killington Select Board answer questions

February 19, 2025
Tuesday night, Feb. 18,the  Killington Pico Area Association (KPAA) held a forum for the four candidates vying for two seats on the Killington Select Board. One seat is for a 3-year term; the other a 1-year term. Incumbent Chris Karr will face a challenge from Patrick Cushing for the 3-year seat. Karr is the owner…

Richard T. Godfrey, Jr., 96

February 19, 2025
Richard T. Godfrey, Jr., beloved husband, father, and grandfather, died of natural causes on Wednesday, Feb.12, at the White River Junction VA Medical Center.  “Dick” was born July 08, 1928, in Norton, Massachusetts, to Richard T. Godfrey, Sr., and Grace (Howard) Godfrey. In 1946, he graduated from Segreganset Agricultural School in Segreganset, Massachusetts. Upon graduation,…

Rutland County employers get over $100,000 in unclaimed property

February 19, 2025
Vermont Treasurer Mike Pieciak joined Rutland Mayor Mike Doenges on Thursday, Feb. 13, to return over $100,000 of unclaimed property to Rutland County employers. The event was held in connection with the Treasurer’s Claim Your Money campaign, an effort to return at least $1 million of unclaimed property to Vermonters in the month of February.…