On April 1, 2020

How does Vermont’s COVID-19 response compare to other states?

By Erin Petenko and Xander Landen/VTDigger

Vermont Gov. Phil Scott issued a “stay home” order on March 24 (effective March 25), then strengthened that order on March 30 with 14-day self-quarantining measures for those traveling in from outside the state. It’s the latest in a series of closures, bans and restrictions intended to keep people at home, away from the risk of spreading COVID-19.

He’s not the only governor taking strong action to combat the epidemic.

Every state in New England has imposed rules on the size of gatherings and limited restaurant use. Deeper analysis has found that on the whole, Vermont timed its increasing closures at the same time or earlier than its neighbors.

In many cases, Vermont announced changes on the same day as New Hampshire.

Both declared a state of emergency on March 13, closed public schools on March 15, and  limited the size of gatherings on March 16.

Then, the Green Mountain State’s stay-at-home order came two days earlier than the Granite State. Compared to the date of both states’ first cases, Vermont was ahead in taking action — borrowing from the steps that states further along in their outbreaks had taken.

Both Vermont and New Hampshire were faster in taking action than Massachusetts, where cases had appeared far earlier. It was one of the first states to report cases in February.

“The beauty of our federal system is that each state can take action without necessarily endangering the actions of the other,” said Jared Carter, a Vermont Law School professor. “And that doesn’t work perfectly in the context of a pandemic because obviously a virus knows no border, but it does allow us to learn from each other and improve.”

Dr. Tim Lahey, an infectious disease physician at UVM Medical Center, said that the differences between many states responding to the crisis including Vermont, New York and Massachusetts are “generally subtle.”

But some states in the South stand out for reacting to the virus more slowly, he said.

He commended Scott’s response to the virus in Vermont. “I think he’s made a call to action and I think he’s tried to base his recommendations on science,” Lahey said. “So I think he’s been doing the best he can with the resources he has.”

Lahey said that in general the United States did not act fast enough to prevent the spread of COVID-19 when it first learned of it in January.

He pointed to South Korea, which has done a better job of slowing the spread. The government there has prioritized aggressive testing and conducted contact tracing for those who were infected earlier.

Ideally, “stay-in-place” orders would have come down when governments initially detected community spread. Lahey said that state governments are reaching the limits of what they can do to combat the pandemic, and that now the federal government — and the military in particular — needs to step up to help hospitals build surge capacity.

Last week, the Vermont National Guard set up medical “surge” sites in Burlington, Barre and St. Albans and this week added a pop-up testing location in Putney to help hospitals manage an anticipated influx of patients. However, Lahey said a bigger response is likely needed. “It’s great to see the National Guard getting involved, but I suspect without a huge wartime mobilization of the size of World War II in Europe that bad things are going to happen in cities around the country.”

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

H.91 would overhaul Vermont’s response to homelessness, dissolving statewide motel program

April 23, 2025
By Carly Berlin/VTDigger This story, by Report for America corps member Carly Berlin, is published via a partnership between VTDigger and Vermont Public. A bill that would fundamentally overhaul Vermont’s response to homelessness is making its way through the Statehouse. H.91 provides a potential off-ramp to the state’s mass use of motel rooms as a…

DMV reminds Vermonters of upcoming REAL ID deadline

April 23, 2025
The Vermont Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is reminding Vermonters that the REAL ID requirement takes effect on May 7, 2025. This means that people aged 18 and older will need a REAL ID-compliant Driver’s License or Identification Card, or another form of identification accepted by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), for domestic air travel and to…

New study shows most Vermonters report good health 

April 23, 2025
Newly released data from the Dept. of Health, April 15, shows that most adults in Vermont report they are in good health, but that education and income levels, disabilities and other factors can lead to stark differences in people’s health.  This data helps state officials and partners monitor trends and prioritize efforts to improve the…

Trade partners

April 23, 2025
For anyone who thinks that what is happening in Washington isn’t having a profound effect on life in Vermont, think again. It began with neighbors being fired from USAID and has evolved into destabilizing commerce with Vermont’s biggest trade partner, Canada. In addition, President Trump’s irresponsible rhetoric about Canada is having a profoundly negative impact…