On February 20, 2019

Notes to home

By Sen. Dick McCormack   

Legislators representing the Springfield region are carefully monitoring developments at Springfield Hospital. The Scott Administration is working with the hospital board and administrators to deal with these highly complex financial issues. They’ve asked for time and patience to work things out, and for politicians to exercise restraint. I’m sorry to disappoint folks who look to their legislators to give voice to their anger, but I think the plea for calm and restraint is reasonable and necessary to work through the situation.

Since convening in January, the Senate Appropriations Committee (SAC), on which I serve, has spent most of our time on the Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Adjustment Act (BAA). The Senate has passed this bill which is now in a conference committee to reconcile differences between the Senate and House versions. The BAA is a true up to correct for differences between expected revenues and expenses, circa spring 2018, and actual revenues and expenses, circa January 2019. It’s also sometimes used as a vehicle for structural changes, but we generally try to avoid using the BAA for big policy changes.

The SAC has now turned its attention to the state budget for fiscal year 2020 (July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020). Under the Vermont Constitution spending bills must begin in the House of Representatives. But in practice the process begins with the Governor’s recommended budget. It is a recommendation only, a template from which the Legislature works, but it carries enough weight that many of my colleagues mistakenly call it “the Budget.”

Although the appropriations bill is still in the House, the SAC is now considering the proposed budget, department by department, in anticipation of the bill eventually reaching the Senate. Witnesses for the various departments testify to the full committee. In addition, each committee member is responsible for evaluating the budgets of particular departments.

Senate Republican leader Joe Benning and I spoke to the Senate Education Committee to urge passage of our bill to require the inclusion of civics in Vermont’s high school curriculum. I held forth on the issue in a previous legislative report. The bill has met with some resistance based on the possibility of controversy. I think some controversy is not only tolerable in a democratic system, it’s desirable.

The Senate Government Operations Committee has taken up the proposal to delete the Vermont Constitution’s prohibition of slavery.

Dick McCormack is a Windsor County senator.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Two members, including chair, resign from the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont

June 25, 2025
By Corey McDonald/VTDigger Two members of the Commission on the Future of Public Education in Vermont, including the commission’s chair, announced last week they would be resigning, saying they no longer believed their efforts would make any impact. Meagan Roy, the chair of the commission, and Nicole Mace, the former representative of the Vermont School Boards…

Vt plastic bag use dropped 91% following ban, researchers find

June 25, 2025
In the midst of 2020 Covid measures, another change took place in Vermont: A law went into effect banning businesses from offering plastic bags to customers, with paper bags only available for a fee. A 2023 analysis of a survey of hundreds of Vermonters found the law appeared to have worked. Plastic bag use in…

A Roadmap

June 25, 2025
The Vermont Legislature adjourned Monday evening, June 16, following the passage of H.454, the education reform plan. I call it a roadmap as the legislation lays out a list of changes that will take place over the next few years. And as various studies and reports come back in, there will also likely be adjustments,…

Vermont to get over $21 million in nationwide settlement with Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers

June 25, 2025
Attorney General Charity Clark announced June 16 that all 55 attorneys general, representing all eligible states and U.S. territories, have agreed to sign on to a $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma and its owners, the Sackler family. This settlement was reached after the previous settlement was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. It resolves…