On August 20, 2014

Lawmakers make alterations in $31 million budget cuts

By Anne Galloway, VTDigger.org

MONTPELIER—A legislative panel has come to an agreement with the Shumlin administration on $31.28 million in cuts to the state budget.

Lawmakers approved a rescission that will remove a 1.6 percent increase in Medicaid reimbursements for health care providers, saving the state about $10 million.

The 10-member Joint Fiscal Committee initially rejected Gov. Peter Shumlin’s proposal and asked the administration to find more money for disability services and elder care.  They also insisted on restoration of funding for a program that helps mentally ill young adults.

Lawmakers insisted that the funding should come from the Vermont Enterprise Fund and a carry-forward in Medicaid funding.  The enterprise fund was originally set at $4.5 million and was designed to provide an incentive to maintain the presence of a large employer in the state.

Jim Reardon, the commissioner of the Department of Finance and Management, told lawmakers that the governor wasn’t happy about transferring money out of the fund, but he agreed to shift $706,000 to disability and elder care services.

The state’s community designated agencies, which provide services to mentally ill and disabled Vermonters, will see a reduction of at least $5 million.

The governor is seeking to reduce the state’s drug and alcohol program by about $673,000.  The proposed cuts eliminate a financial incentive payment for substance abuse treatment providers and carry through the level funding of Medicaid reimbursements.

The Shumlin administration also proposes to rescind a 1 percent increase to appropriations for the University of Vermont, the Vermont Student Assistance Corp. and the Vermont State Colleges.

Working landscape grants would be reduced by about $280,000 under the plan.

The state no longer needs to spend $500,000 on the All-Felon DNA program because the Vermont Supreme Court recently determined that taking a DNA sample from a suspect before he or she is convicted is unconstitutional.

The Shumlin administration will not fill vacancies in state government, including a seat on the Superior Court.  Seven open state trooper positions will not be filled for a savings of $500,000.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Vermont receives $5.3 million in federal grants to expand internet access across the state

November 27, 2024
By Klara Bauters / VTDigger Vermont has been awarded $5.3 million from the federal government to implement its Digital Equity Plan — which outlines how the state will provide individuals and communities with the tools and skills necessary to benefit from meaningful access to affordable, reliable, high-speed internet service. “Internet and broadband. It’s no longer…

Experts fear Trump environmental policies could undermine Vt’s efforts

November 27, 2024
By Emma Cotton/VTDigger As Donald Trump prepares to return to the presidency, experts worry that his climate and environmental policy goals could destabilize ongoing work in Vermont. The president-elect campaigned on tossing out policies related to climate change and loosening or abandoning environmental regulations. As a small state, Vermont leans on federal funding and regulatory frameworks…

VTSU sees 20% enrollment growth in plumbing, electrical apprenticeship programs

November 27, 2024
As the state kicked off Apprenticeship Week last week, Vermont State University (VTSU) announced that its plumbing and electrical registered apprenticeship programs have grown over 20% in two years. Enrollment for the current academic year is at a record high of over 870 apprentices after multiple years of sustained growth. “Vermont State University is dedicated…

Outdoor recreation organizations implore courts to support public access to trails in Vermont

November 27, 2024
A coalition of outdoor recreation organizations led by the Vermont Trails and Greenways Council (VTGC), issued a statement Nov. 18 urging the Vermont Supreme Court to carefully consider the long-term implications of its upcoming ruling regarding the maintenance of public access trails on private land.  The case, which involves the use of a “legal trail” maintained by the town that crosses…