On March 6, 2024

Vermonters rejected nearly one-third of school budgets

On Town Meeting Day 29 of 93 reported budgets were voted down

By Ethan Weinstein/VTDigger

Voters struck down close to a third of school budgets across Vermont on Tuesday, March 5, the highest proportion in at least a decade, according to the Vermont Superintendents Association. 

Twenty-nine of 93 reported budgets were rejected, according to unofficial results collected by the association. Four districts still hadn’t reported as of early Wednesday afternoon, and 22 have votes still to come.

Last year, only two budgets were rejected on Town Meeting Day.

Leading up to Tuesday, voters had expressed dismay at the anticipated increase in education property taxes, projected to rise by an average of 19%, due in part to a proposed increase of more than $200 million in school spending.

In a joint statement, the superintendents association and the Vermont School Boards Association called for state and local collaboration in the face of a historic rejection of school budgets.

“Yesterday’s school district voting results indicate that, as a community, we have work to do in supporting our public education system and the taxpayers who fund it,” read the statement. “In an environment where societal needs are growing and the capacity of our public systems is diminishing, schools are expanding services to meet the needs of students and families. As a result, costs are mounting.”

School boards have until July 1 to rework budgets and pass them. If they’re unable to secure approval for a revised budget, districts can borrow up to 87% of their last passed budget to pay for operations.

The following districts or supervisory unions failed to pass budgets on Tuesday, according to the superintendents association:

• Addison Northwest School District
• Alburgh School District
• Barre Unified Union School District
• Barstow Unified Union
• Champlain Islands Unified Union School District
• Champlain Valley School District
• Elmore/Morristown Unified Union School District
• Enosburg-Richford School District 
• Fairfax School District
• Green Mountain Unified School District
• Harwood Unified Union
• Holland School District
• Kingdom East School District
• Lamoille North Modified Unified Union School District, elementary budget
• Milton School District
• Montpelier-Roxbury School District
• Mount Abraham Unified School District
• Northern Mountain Valley Unified Union School District
• Otter Valley Unified Union
• Paine Mountain School District
• Rutland Town School District
• Slate Valley Unified Union School District
• South Burlington School District
• South Hero School District
• Springfield School District 
• St. Johnsbury School District

 

Schools this Town Meeting Day grappled with the latest changes to Vermont’s education funding formula, which affected how much money towns could spend at a given tax rate, and became a target of school spending frustration.

Amid concerns about dramatic property tax hikes and questions about the impact of the state’s revamped education financing formula, lawmakers passed, and Gov. Phil Scott signed, eleventh-hour legislation last month allowing districts to postpone their budget votes to next month. 

Don Tinney, president of the Vermont-National Education Association, a teachers union, said in a statement that a “once-in-a-generation confluence of events” had fueled this year’s projected property tax increases. 

“I know that last night’s rejection of nearly a third of all school budgets isn’t a repudiation of our local public schools and the tens of thousands of Vermont students they serve every day,” Tinney said. “Rather, it’s a reasonable reaction to completely unrealistic spikes in property taxes driven by events over which our dedicated local school boards have no control.”

Now, as school boards must redraft budgets, the average estimated education property increase for Vermonters will almost certainly fall, though the exact extent will remain unknown until all budgets pass and the Legislature works through other Education Fund considerations.

Do you want to submit feedback to the editor?

Send Us An Email!

Related Posts

Scott administration unveils education plan with just 5 school districts statewide

January 23, 2025
by Ethan Weinstein/VTDigger State officials unveiled the broad strokes of Gov. Phil Scott’s education proposal on Wednesday, Jan. 22, a plan that includes sweeping changes like consolidating Vermont’s dozens of school districts to just five and adopting a foundation formula. “We know that the work that we’re describing here is going to be really challenging,”…

Clean heat standard is less expensive than previously thought, though not ‘well suited to Vermont,’ commission says

January 22, 2025
By Emma Cotton/VTDigger The chair of the state’s Public Utility Commission told lawmakers on Thursday, while presenting a long-awaited report, that implementing the controversial clean heat standard could cost significantly less than others have previously suggested. However, chairman Ed McNamara concluded that the commission recommends that the state not move forward with it. Debate about…

Top issues facing local towns this session

January 22, 2025
The issues most important for the voters in Windsor-5 remain:   1.  Education financing 2.  State aid for school construction 3.  Accessible housing 4.  Adapting to more severe and frequent weather events. Close behind and contributing to the high costs of living and working in Vermont is:  5.  High cost of healthcare and health insurance. …

Anticipation

January 22, 2025
This Wednesday, Jan. 22, members of the administration will share with all lawmakers their proposal to reform Vermont’s education system and the way to fund it. One leading legislator, who was briefed on the proposal, indicated the reform plan may be the biggest overhaul the Legislature has seen in 50 years. It’s no secret that…